Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Rationale: Throughout at least the next century, CO(2) fertilization and environmental stresses (e.g. nutrient, moisture, insect herbivory) are predicted to affect yields of economically important crop species. Stable isotopes of carbon are used to study plant stresses, which affect yields, but a growth chamber design that can be used to isolate the effects of environmental stresses on crop-sized species through precise maintenance of pCO(2) levels and the δ(13)C values of atmospheric CO(2) (δ(13) C(CO2)) is lacking.
Methods: We designed and built low-cost plant growth chambers for growing staple crop species under precise pCO(2) and δ(13) C(CO2) conditions. Over the course of 14 hours, we assessed for pCO(2) stability at two targeted levels (ambient, ~400 ppm; and 2×, ~800 ppm) and measured the δ(13) C(CO2) value within the two chambers using a stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer. We also compared the temperature and relative humidity conditions within the two growth chambers, and in the ambient, outside air.
Results: Across our experimental period, we achieved δ(13) C(CO2) stability (ambient: -8.05 ± 0.17‰; elevated: -12.99 ± 0.29‰) that showed nearly half the variability of any previously reported values for other chamber designs. The stability of the pCO(2) conditions (ambient: 406 ± 3 ppm; elevated: 793 ± 54 ppm) was comparable with that in previous studies, but our design provided ~8 times more growing space than previous chamber designs. We also measured nearly identical temperature and relative humidity conditions for the two chambers throughout the experiment.
Conclusions: Our growth chamber design marks a significant improvement in our ability to test for plant stress across a range of future pCO(2) scenarios. Through significant improvement in δ(13) C(CO2) stability and increased chamber size, small changes in carbon isotope fractionation can be used to assess stress in crop species under specific environmental (temperature, relative humidity, pCO(2)) conditions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7121 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!