A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ten-year legacy effects of baseline blood pressure 'treatment naivety' in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study. | LitMetric

Ten-year legacy effects of baseline blood pressure 'treatment naivety' in the Second Australian National Blood Pressure study.

J Hypertens

aMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart bDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne cFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast dSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth eSchool of Medicine, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, Australia.

Published: November 2015

Objectives: Current blood pressure (BP) management guidelines recommend that treatment thresholds for BP be based on absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk rather than on elevated BP levels alone. Clinicians are concerned that delayed pharmacotherapy in individuals with high BP, but low CVD risk, may increase long-term CVD events. To investigate this, we examined differences in CVD events within the Second Australian National BP study (ANBP2) for those previously on pharmacotherapy and those who were not, as well as fatal events in the 6-year post-trial period.

Methods: Population consisted of ANBP2 participants without a prior CVD event. Adjusted Cox-regression hazard models were used to assess the effects of prior BP pharmacotherapy use on cardiovascular endpoints within ANBP2. An extended 6-year follow-up analysis for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was also conducted.

Results: We found a higher in-trial CVD and all-cause mortality rate and incidence of new-onset diabetes for those on previous treatment versus those who were treatment-naive. We investigated whether this was an effect of the in-trial protocol, but this did not explain the observed differences. No difference in CVD or all-cause mortality at 10 years was observed between 'treatment-naive' and 'previous treatment' groups.

Conclusion: We found no long-term adverse mortality associated with treatment naivety of elevated BP in an elderly hypertensive cohort, but this finding is likely to be confounded as seen by the lower in-trial mortality in the 'treatment-naive' group. Legacy effects need to be explored in randomized trials of middle-aged populations where the clinical concern lies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000000709DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
12
all-cause mortality
12
legacy effects
8
second australian
8
australian national
8
cvd risk
8
cvd events
8
cvd all-cause
8
cvd
7
mortality
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!