WHEN CONSCIENCE ISN'T CLEAR: GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD v DOOGAN AND ANOTHER [2014] UKSC 68.

Med Law Rev

Strathclyde Law School, University of Strathclyde, 50 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK

Published: August 2016

The Supreme Court's judgment in Doogan is a judicial review of a decision by Greater Glasgow Health Board regarding the scope of the conscience-based exemption in section 4(1) of the Abortion Act 1967. The case progressed through the Outer and Inner Houses of the Court of Session in Edinburgh before final judgment was delivered in the Supreme Court by Baroness Hale on December 17 2014. The Supreme Court eschewed consideration of the human rights dimension of the case (which had featured in the Outer House decision) and approached its judgment as 'a pure question of statutory construction'. This commentary engages with the judgment on its own terms, assessing it as an exercise in statutory interpretation, and leaves it to others who may wish to do so to comment on the human rights aspects of the case.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwv027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

greater glasgow
8
glasgow health
8
health board
8
supreme court
8
human rights
8
conscience clear
4
clear greater
4
board doogan
4
doogan [2014]
4
[2014] uksc
4

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!