Aims: The randomized PROTECT AF trial demonstrated non-inferiority of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure to oral anticoagulation with warfarin. Current guidelines give a class IIb recommendation for LAA closure. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of LAA closure in a consecutive series of non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation or at high bleeding risk.
Methods And Results: 101 consecutive non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients (age 74.7 ± 7.5 years) at high risk for stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc Score 4.4 ± 1.6) and high bleeding risk (HAS-BLED Score 4.2 ± 1.3) received LAA closure with either the Watchman closure device (n = 38) or the Amplatzer cardiac plug (n = 63). Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel was recommended for 3-6 months after device implantation, followed by long-term antiplatelet therapy with aspirin. No anticoagulation was given after device implantation. Mean follow-up was 400 days. One patient (1 %) experienced a transient ischemic attack, and two patients (2 %) suffered from ischemic stroke. While on recommended antiplatelet therapy, bleeding occurred in 12/101 patients (12 %). Bleeding was significantly reduced with 3 compared with 6 months dual antiplatelet therapy (3.0 vs. 16.2 %, p < 0.05) while ischemic or thrombotic events were similar.
Conclusion: Left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and high risk for stroke and bleeding events effectively prevented stroke and reduced cerebral ischemic events compared to expected stroke rate according to CHA2DS2-VASc Score. Dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 months reduced the rate of bleeding events compared to 6 months therapy with no increase of thrombotic events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0910-8 | DOI Listing |
Front Neurol
January 2025
Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Introduction: In the past decade, flow diverters (FDs) have increasingly been used to treat cerebral aneurysms with unfavorable morphology in which other endovascular techniques fall short of being as effective. In-stent stenosis (ISS) is one of the most puzzling and frequent risks of flow diversion therapy observed on follow-ups. This complication, although mostly placid in its clinical course, can have dire consequences if patients become symptomatic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Neurol
January 2025
Neurology Department, Navarre University Hospital, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
Introduction: Severe or complicated atheromatosis of the aortic arch represents an important and often underdiagnosed embolic source in patients with ischemic stroke. The presence of a floating thrombus has significant clinical relevance, as it is associated with a high risk of early recurrence. The aim of this study was to analyze the potential of echocardiographic examination through the suprasternal window in both the detection of embolic sources and the monitoring of the response to anticoagulant treatment in patients with mobile thrombi.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
January 2025
Department of Hand and Microsurgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are one of the most challenging and severe forms of infections. The prognosis requires accurate and aggressive diagnosis and management. In this case, we present an unexplained case of concurrence of TE events following BKA for the surgical management of NSTI.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRes Pract Thromb Haemost
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Background: Reduced effect of antiplatelet therapy has been reported in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This could partly be explained by an increase of highly reactive immature platelets.
Objectives: To investigate changes in platelet maturity and reactivity after acute STEMI.
Cureus
December 2024
Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MYS.
Distal humerus physeal separation is an uncommon and often misdiagnosed injury in infants and young children, frequently resulting in delayed treatment. We report three cases of distal humerus physeal separation that presented with different clinical scenarios with different management approaches. The first case describes a nine-month-old girl who was initially treated for presumed elbow cellulitis before presentation to our centre six weeks later.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!