Identifying Targeted Strategies to Improve Smoking Cessation Support for Cancer Patients.

J Thorac Oncol

*Department of Radiation Oncology, †Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina; ‡Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, RPCI, Buffalo, New York; §Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, South Carolina; ‖International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and ¶Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Science, RPCI, Buffalo, New York.

Published: November 2015

Introduction: Although smoking causes adverse outcomes in cancer patients, most oncology providers do not regularly provide smoking cessation support. The purpose of this study was to identify key areas that can be targeted to improve delivery of evidence-based cessation support for cancer patients.

Methods: In 2012, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer surveyed members asking about tobacco assessment and cessation practices for cancer patients. Responses from 1153 physician level oncology providers were analyzed to evaluate the effects of respondent demographics, tobacco use perceptions, and perceived barriers to providing cessation support on practice patterns.

Results: Respondents from the United States generally reported higher rates of asking about tobacco use, advising patients to quit, and assisting patients in quitting smoking. Work setting, time since completing a terminal degree, percent of time devoted to clinical care, and history of tobacco use were generally associated with asking about tobacco use and advising patients to quit, but not associated with discussing medications or actively treating patients. The dominant multivariate barriers to providing cessation support were a lack of clinician education or experience and lack of available resources to refer patients for smoking cessation support. Patient resistance to treatment, inability for patients to quit smoking, or feeling that smoking was not an important part of cancer outcome or cancer care had less meaningful associations with providing support.

Conclusions: Improving clinician education and developing dedicated resources to provide cessation support were identified as ideal targets to address for improving cessation support for cancer patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000659DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cessation support
32
cancer patients
16
smoking cessation
12
support cancer
12
patients quit
12
patients
10
cessation
9
support
8
cancer
8
oncology providers
8

Similar Publications

Eliciting Preferences for the Uptake of Smoking Cessation Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.

J Med Internet Res

January 2025

Behavioural and Implementation Science Group, School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Background: If the most evidence-based and effective smoking cessation apps are not selected by smokers wanting to quit, their potential to support cessation is limited.

Objective: This study sought to determine the attributes that influence smoking cessation app uptake and understand their relative importance to support future efforts to present evidence-based apps more effectively to maximize uptake.

Methods: Adult smokers from the United Kingdom were invited to participate in a discrete choice experiment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective And Rationale: This study assessed support for novel tobacco compared with alcohol control policies among adults in Great Britain in 2021-2023. Objectives were to assess 1) overall level of support for tobacco compared to alcohol control policies; 2) level of support for tobacco compared to alcohol control policies among people who smoke tobacco or who consume alcohol at increasing and higher risk levels, or who do both; 3) level of support for tobacco compared to alcohol control policies among different sociodemographic groups?

Methods: Data were collected in September/October 2021-2023 in a monthly population-based survey on smoking and drinking behaviour of adults across Great Britain (N = 6311), weighted to match the overall population. Outcome measure was level of support for each seven tobacco and alcohol control policies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Smoking is the leading preventable cause of death and the single most significant risk behaviour contributing to adverse health conditions among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. There is an urgent need for innovative approaches to support reductions in smoking prevalence. This study will assess the implementation and effectiveness of a mailed smoking cessation support programme that includes nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) () for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Tobacco smoking has been associated with reduced success in the labor market, potentially due to its negative impact on labor productivity, especially in physically demanding jobs, as it affects physical fitness and performance adversely.

Methods: This prospective study used data from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study survey, linked to register information on labor market outcomes and education attainment, to examine the association between tobacco smoking and long-term labor market outcomes (earnings and employment, N = 1953). Smoking levels were determined by cigarette pack-years in 2001, as reported in the survey, whereas annual earnings and employment status were tracked from 2001 to 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Increasing a Quitline's Reach to Low-Income Tobacco Users Through 211 Agencies.

Nicotine Tob Res

January 2025

California Tobacco Prevention Program, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Introduction: Low-income individuals bear a disproportionate share of the burden of tobacco use. This study tested the feasibility of increasing a quitline's reach to low-income tobacco users by collaborating with 211 information and referral agencies, which primarily serve people experiencing economic hardship.

Aims And Methods: Study participants (N = 114 888) were adult tobacco users referred to the California quitline by 211 agencies, referred by healthcare clinics, or self-referred from April 17, 2021 to December 31, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!