Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?

Int J Obes (Lond)

Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Published: February 2016

Background: Despite strong indications of a high prevalence of weight-related stigmatization in individuals with obesity, limited attention has been given to the role of weight discrimination in examining the stigma obesity. Studies, up to date, rely on a limited basis of data sets and additional studies are needed to confirm the findings of previous studies. In particular, data for Europe are lacking, and are needed in light of a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice that addressed weight-based discrimination.

Methods: The data were derived from a large representative telephone survey in Germany (n=3003). The dependent variable, weight-based discrimination, was assessed with a one-item question. The lifetime prevalence of weight discrimination across different sociodemographic variables was determined. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of independent and dependent variables. A sub-group analysis was conducted analyzing all participants with a body mass index ⩾25 kg m(-)(2).

Results: The overall prevalence of weight-based discrimination was 7.3%. Large differences, however, were observed regarding weight status. In normal weight and overweight participants the prevalence was 5.6%, but this number doubled in participants with obesity class I (10.2%), and quadrupled in participants with obesity class II (18.7%) and underweight (19.7%). In participants with obesity class III, every third participant reported accounts of weight-based discrimination (38%). In regression models, after adjustment, the associations of weight status and female gender (odds ratio: 2.59, P<0.001) remained highly significant.

Conclusions: Discrimination seems to be an ubiquitary phenomenon at least for some groups that are at special risk, such as heavier individuals and women. Our findings therefore emphasize the need for research and intervention on weight discrimination among adults with obesity, including anti-discrimination legislation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.165DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

weight-based discrimination
16
participants obesity
12
obesity class
12
weight discrimination
8
regression models
8
weight status
8
weight-based
5
obesity
5
weight
5
discrimination
5

Similar Publications

Background: The prediction of human clearance (CL) and subcutaneous (SC) bioavailability is a critical aspect of monoclonal antibody (mAb) selection for clinical development. While monkeys are a well-accepted model for predicting human CL, other preclinical species have been less-thoroughly explored. Unlike CL, predicting the bioavailability of SC administered mAbs in humans remains challenging as contributing factors are not well understood, and preclinical models have not been systematically evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transitive inference, the ability to establish hierarchical relationships between stimuli, is typically tested by training with premise pairs (e.g., A + B-, B + C-, C + D-, D + E-), which establishes a stimulus hierarchy (A > B > C > D > E).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How Weight Bias and Stigma Undermine Healthcare Access and Utilization.

Curr Obes Rep

January 2025

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Box 100165, Gainesville, 32610-0165, FL, USA.

Purpose Of Review: To highlight recent evidence of the impact of weight bias and stigma on healthcare access and utilization.

Recent Findings: Healthcare access for patients with obesity is limited by weight-discriminatory policies such as body mass index cutoffs and weight loss requirements. These policies are based on flawed justifications without demonstrated medical benefits.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: It has been reported that even with the same body mass index (BMI), there are subjects with metabolically healthy or unhealthy phenotype. The main determinants of the unhealthy phenotype are the type and distribution of fat, ectopic fat accumulation, genetics, and lifestyle factors. Uncoupling proteins (UCPs) disengage mitochondrial respiration from ATP synthesis and result in heat production, which in turn is related to energy expenditure and, thus, to fat mass accumulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!