Introduction: Deciding on the strategy in rectal cancer´s treatment requires a complex and multidisciplinary approach. The primary rectal resection is indicated in early stages, while locally advanced tumors should be pretreated by one of the modes of neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy. The main goal of this study was to explore the therapeutic strategy in patients with rectal cancer in the Czech Republic. The second aim was to determine the incidence of the pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: This is a retrospective multicenter clinical study, which includes data from all patients with rectal cancer who were treated at participating centers in the period from 01/01/2011 to 31/12/2012. The required data has been passed into the online registry PATOD C20.Three issues have been set up: 1. Characteristics of the center and cooperation with the oncological department; 2. Characteristics of the treatment of patients with rectal cancer; and 3. Detailed analysis of the group of patients with complete pathological response. The analysis was performed with regard to the nature of individual departments, i.e. departments of surgery in university hospitals with complex oncological centres, departments of surgery within complex oncologic centers, and departments of surgery outside complex oncologic centers.

Results: In total, 21 departments of surgery in the Czech Republic provided data about 1860 patients with rectal cancer for the study. The treatment strategy for rectal cancer was determined at multidisciplinary seminars at 19 centers (90.5%). Statistically significant differences between the centers were found in the indication for neoadjuvant treatment (p<0.001), rectal resection with anastomosis (p=0.048), and resection without anastomosis (p=0.022). Complete pathological response was found in 61 (8.7%) patients. Positivity of mesorectal lymph nodes (ypN+) was found in the case of ypT0 stage in 7 (9.7%) patients.

Conclusion: PATOD study showed that therapy of rectal cancer is highly heterogeneous in the Czech Republic. Despite the best conditions provided, university hospitals and large departments within complex oncologic centers do not fully utilize this benefit.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
24
patients rectal
16
departments surgery
16
czech republic
12
rectal
8
cancer czech
8
complete pathological
8
pathological response
8
response neoadjuvant
8
strategy rectal
8

Similar Publications

Mastering rectal cancer MRI: From foundational concepts to optimal staging.

Eur J Radiol

January 2025

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester. 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 75 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP 05403-010, Brazil. Electronic address:

MRI plays a critical role in the local staging, restaging, surveillance, and risk stratification of patients, ensuring they receive the most tailored therapy. As such, radiologists must be familiar not only with the key MRI findings that influence management decisions but also with the appropriate MRI protocols and structured reporting. Given the complexity of selecting the optimal therapy for each patient-which often requires multidisciplinary discussions-radiologists should be well-versed in relevant treatment strategies and surgical terms, understanding their significance in guiding patient care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Dosimetric comparison of CyberKnife and conventional linac prostate SBRT plans: analysis of the PACE-B Study.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

January 2025

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5PT, UK; Radiotherapy and Imaging Division, Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK.

Purpose: In the PACE-B study, a non-randomised comparison of toxicity outcomes between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) platforms revealed fewer urinary side-effects with CyberKnife (CK) compared to conventional linac (CL) SBRT. This analysis compares baseline characteristics and planning dosimetry between the CK-SBRT and CL-SBRT cohorts in PACE-B, aiming to provide insight into possible reasons for differing toxicity outcomes between the platforms.

Methods: Dosimetric parameters for the surrogate urethra (SU), contoured urethra, bladder, bladder trigone (BT), and rectum were extracted from available CT planning scans of PACE-B SBRT patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!