A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.

AJR Am J Roentgenol

1 All authors: Department of Radiology, C-2S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Published: September 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the radiation doses used in CT urography (CTU) before and after adopting a new scanning protocol that utilizes iterative reconstruction (AIDR 3D).
  • Researchers compared historical CTU data from 2011 (using filtered back projection) with more recent data from 2012-2013 (using AIDR 3D), focusing on patient characteristics and various dose metrics.
  • Results indicated a significant reduction in median total dose (DLP and effective dose) with AIDR 3D, while maintaining diagnostic image quality, suggesting improved safety in routine clinical practice.

Article Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to survey the radiation dose used in CT urography (CTU) in routine clinical practice, both before and after implementation of a scanning protocol that uses iterative reconstruction (Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D [AIDR 3D]).

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively surveyed dose reports from consecutive CTU examinations performed in 2011 with the use of 64- and 320-MDCT scanners that were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and from CTU examinations performed from May 2012 through November 2013 that were reconstructed with the use of AIDR 3D. Findings from these dose reports were then correlated with such patient characteristics as weight and body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters). Only dose reports from single-bolus three-phase CTU examinations were included in the study. The volume CT dose index, dose-length product (DLP), and effective dose were surveyed both per examination and per phase by use of published effective dose DLP conversion factors. Image quality was evaluated subjectively for a subset of patients.

Results: The two study cohorts included 82 patients (median patient weight, 75.0 kg; median BMI, 25.3) who underwent CTU with FBP and 85 patients (median patient weight, 78.0 kg; median BMI, 24.5) who underwent CTU with AIDR 3D. The median total DLP and median effective dose were 924 mGy · cm and 13.0 mSv, respectively, in the CTU with the FBP cohort and 433 mGy · cm and 6.1 mSv, respectively, in the CTU with the AIDR 3D cohort. The median DLP in the unenhanced, nephrogenic, and excretory phases was 218, 300, and 441 mGy · cm, respectively, in patients undergoing CTU with FBP and 114, 121, and 190 mGy · cm, respectively, in patients undergoing CTU with AIDR 3D. Image quality was diagnostic in both groups, with relatively fewer artifacts noted on scans obtained using CTU with AIDR 3D.

Conclusion: Our study presents detailed dose data from three-phase CTU examinations performed both before and after implementation of iterative reconstruction. Implementation of a CTU protocol using iterative reconstruction resulted in a mean effective dose of 6.1 mSv with preservation of clinical diagnostic image quality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.13862DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iterative reconstruction
16
ctu examinations
16
effective dose
16
ctu aidr
16
ctu
13
dose reports
12
examinations performed
12
image quality
12
ctu fbp
12
dose
11

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!