Background: Health care providers encourage organ donation on a regular basis. The objective of this study was to analyze the coherence of the attitudes of health care providers toward organ donation, their willingness to receive organs and the differences among different health care practitioners and other hospital workers regarding to this ethical issue.
Methods: A 33-question survey was conducted among staff members from 9 different health care institutions in different sites from North and Central America. The confidential and anonymous questionnaire addressed personal opinions regarding organ donation as well as other ethical/religious issues.
Results: Of 858 surveys conducted, 853 were completed. Among the participants, physicians accounted for 21.1% (n = 180), nurses 37.1% (n = 317), and other hospital workers 41.7% (n = 356). Respondents were almost equally divided into organ donors 45.7% (n = 392) and nondonors 53.7% (n = 461). Doctors and nurses were significantly more likely to be organ donors than other hospital workers (P < .043). An overwhelming majority of responders would accept an organ transplant if required (90.2%; n = 774). Organ donors were more likely to accept an organ transplant if required than nonorgan donors (96.4% [n = 370] vs 88.7% [n = 400], respectively; P < .001).
Conclusions: Among health care providers, physicians and nurses tended to be more likely to be in favor of organ donation. The majority of the participants were willing to accept an organ, and there was a statistical correlation between disposition to donation and willingness to receive an organ.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.06.015 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Radiol
January 2025
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Division of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA. Electronic address:
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of aortoiliac CT-Angiography (CTA) using dual-source photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT with minimal iodine dose.
Methods: This IRB-approved, single-center prospective study enrolled patients with indications for aortoiliac CTA from December 2022 to March 2023. All scans were performed using a first-generation dual-source PCD-CT.
Aten Primaria
January 2025
Fundació Institut Universitari per a la Recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, España; Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, España; Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, España.
Objective: To characterise patients with heart failure (HF) in Primary Health Care (PHC) and describe their socio-demographic and clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment.
Design: Descriptive cohort study. SITE: Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP), which captures information from the electronic health records of PHC of the Catalan Institute of Health (approximately 80% of the Catalan population).
Pediatr Infect Dis J
January 2025
Public Health Secretariat, Department of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Background: In Catalonia, infants <6 months old were eligible to receive nirsevimab, a novel monoclonal antibody against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). We aimed to analyze nirsevimab's effectiveness in hospital-related outcomes of the seasonal cohort (born during the RSV epidemic from October to January 2024) and compared them with the catch-up cohort (born from April to September 2023).
Methods: Retrospective cohort study of all infants born between October 1, 2023, and January 21, 2024, according to their immunization with nirsevimab (immunized and nonimmunized).
JMIR Form Res
January 2025
Early Intervention in Psychosis Advisory Unit for South-East Norway, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Background: Shared decision-making between clinicians and service users is crucial in mental health care. One significant barrier to achieving this goal is the lack of user-centered services. Integrating digital tools into mental health services holds promise for addressing some of these challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!