Sleep spindle and K-complex detection using tunable Q-factor wavelet transform and morphological component analysis.

Front Hum Neurosci

DYCOG Lab, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, UMR 5292, University Lyon I Lyon, France ; Psychology Department, University of Montreal Montreal, QC, Canada.

Published: August 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • A new method for detecting sleep spindles and K-complexes from EEG signals is introduced, utilizing morphological component analysis (MCA) in conjunction with a specific wavelet transform called discrete tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT).
  • The method shows promising results, detecting spindles with an 83.18% sensitivity and K-complexes with an 81.57% sensitivity, while achieving acceptable levels of false discovery rate (FDR) compared to expert scoring.
  • Performance evaluation against other detection methods indicates that this approach could be a strong alternative, with suggestions for further improvements and validation using larger public datasets.

Article Abstract

A novel framework for joint detection of sleep spindles and K-complex events, two hallmarks of sleep stage S2, is proposed. Sleep electroencephalography (EEG) signals are split into oscillatory (spindles) and transient (K-complex) components. This decomposition is conveniently achieved by applying morphological component analysis (MCA) to a sparse representation of EEG segments obtained by the recently introduced discrete tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (TQWT). Tuning the Q-factor provides a convenient and elegant tool to naturally decompose the signal into an oscillatory and a transient component. The actual detection step relies on thresholding (i) the transient component to reveal K-complexes and (ii) the time-frequency representation of the oscillatory component to identify sleep spindles. Optimal thresholds are derived from ROC-like curves (sensitivity vs. FDR) on training sets and the performance of the method is assessed on test data sets. We assessed the performance of our method using full-night sleep EEG data we collected from 14 participants. In comparison to visual scoring (Expert 1), the proposed method detected spindles with a sensitivity of 83.18% and false discovery rate (FDR) of 39%, while K-complexes were detected with a sensitivity of 81.57% and an FDR of 29.54%. Similar performances were obtained when using a second expert as benchmark. In addition, when the TQWT and MCA steps were excluded from the pipeline the detection sensitivities dropped down to 70% for spindles and to 76.97% for K-complexes, while the FDR rose up to 43.62 and 49.09%, respectively. Finally, we also evaluated the performance of the proposed method on a set of publicly available sleep EEG recordings. Overall, the results we obtained suggest that the TQWT-MCA method may be a valuable alternative to existing spindle and K-complex detection methods. Paths for improvements and further validations with large-scale standard open-access benchmarking data sets are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4516876PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00414DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spindle k-complex
8
k-complex detection
8
tunable q-factor
8
q-factor wavelet
8
wavelet transform
8
morphological component
8
component analysis
8
sleep spindles
8
transient component
8
performance method
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!