Background: This paper examines two state-led public-private demand-side financial support programs aiming to raise hospital delivery rates in two neighbouring Indian states-Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. The national Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) was complemented with a public-private partnership program Janani Sahayogi Yojana (JSaY) in Madhya Pradesh in which private obstetricians were paid to deliver poor women. A higher amount was paid for caesarean sections (CS) than for vaginal deliveries (VD). In Gujarat state, the state program Chiranjeevi Yojana (CY) paid private obstetricians a fixed amount for a block 100 deliveries irrespective of delivery mode. The two systems thus offered an opportunity to observe the influence of supplier-induced demand (SID) from opposite incentives related to delivery mode.

Methods: The data from the two programs was sourced from the Departments of Health and Family Welfare, Governments of Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, India.

Results: In JSaY program the CS rate increased from 26.6% (2007-2008) to 40.7% (2010-2011), against the background rate for CS in Madhya Pradesh, of only 4.9% (2004-2006). Meanwhile in CY program in Gujarat, the CS rate decreased to 4.3% (2010-2011) against a background CS rate of 8.1% (2004-2006).

Conclusions: The findings from India are unique in that they not only point to a significant impact from the introduction of the financial incentives but also how disincentives have an inverse impact on the choice of delivery method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4712220PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1810-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

madhya pradesh
16
demand-side financial
8
financial support
8
support programs
8
supplier-induced demand
8
private obstetricians
8
2010-2011 background
8
background rate
8
impact alternative
4
alternative maternal
4

Similar Publications

In a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of adjunctive asenapine, bipolar I disorder patients experiencing manic or mixed episodes despite pretreatment with lithium or valproate monotherapy were treated with flexible-dose, twice-daily asenapine 5 or 10 mg (n = 158) or placebo (n = 166). The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score at week 3. Secondary outcomes included YMRS response and remission and Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score changes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!