Air-Q intubating supraglottic device for tracheal tumor resection.

J Clin Anesth

Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.

Published: February 2016

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.06.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

air-q intubating
4
intubating supraglottic
4
supraglottic device
4
device tracheal
4
tracheal tumor
4
tumor resection
4
air-q
1
supraglottic
1
device
1
tracheal
1

Similar Publications

Introduction: The effectiveness of supraglottic airway devices (SGDs) as a strategy for blind endotracheal intubation (ETI) was compared in this study.

Methods: A systematic review of clinical trials (CTs) involving SGDs for blind ETI in patients under general anesthesia or simulation manikins, was conducted. CTs that used SGDs for fiberoptic-guided ETI and those conducted in children were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Over the last two decades, significant research interest has led to the development of a wide variety of supraglottic airways (SGAs) for anaesthesia providers to choose from.

Methods: In this network meta-analysis, we analysed 111 studies, enrolling 12 045 patients undergoing airway management with 29 SGAs. We targeted outcomes that contribute to clinicians' choice of one SGA over another.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Results showed that the LMA blockbuster had a significantly higher success rate (91.4%) for blind intubation compared to the Air-Q ILA (55.7%).
  • * Despite similar numbers of attempts and insertion times for both devices, the LMA blockbuster proved to be more effective, particularly when enhanced with specialized tubes and techniques.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compared the Air-Q Self Pressurized Airway Device with Blocker (SP Blocker) to the Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adult female patients undergoing elective surgeries.
  • Significant results showed that the SP Blocker had better performance on key metrics like oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), lower peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), and improved tidal volumes compared to the PLMA.
  • Additionally, the SP Blocker allowed for faster insertion times, indicating it may be a more effective option for airway management during surgeries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!