A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake as a predictor of large joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * A significant correlation was found between the FDG-PET standardized uptake value (SUV) and joint destruction progression, indicating that higher FDG uptake is linked to worse outcomes, both in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing joints.
  • * Factors influencing joint damage included a higher SUV and lower doses of prednisolone, suggesting that inflammation, indicated by FDG uptake, may predict future radiographic changes in RA patients.

Article Abstract

The present retrospective study investigated the relationship between [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) findings and subsequent progression of joint destruction on plain X-ray. Nineteen rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (59 joints) who underwent FDG-PET and whose joints could be evaluated on plain X-ray 5 years later were included in this retrospective investigation. The relationship between the standardized uptake value (SUV) on FDG-PET and Larsen grade progression on plain X-ray was investigated for each joint. Factors related to progression of joint destruction were also investigated. Joints with advanced joint destruction (Larsen grades IV and V) on X-ray imaging at the time of FDG-PET were excluded. On initial plain X-ray images taken at the time of FDG-PET, a significant correlation was observed between the initial SUV of each joint and the progression of joint destruction 5 years later (R = 0.47, P < 0.01). Significant correlations between the SUV and progression of joint destruction were observed in both load-bearing (R = 0.52, P < 0.01) and non-load-bearing joints (R = 0.52, P < 0.01). On logistic regression analysis, higher SUV and lower prednisolone dose were associated with greater risk of progressive joint destruction (P < 0.05). On receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the optimum threshold for identifying preceding joint destruction was an SUVmean of 1.33. In RA joints, FDG uptake was seen mostly by inflammatory cells; therefore, FDG uptake reflected joint inflammation. Additionally, the activity seen on FDG-PET might be associated with future radiographic changes in RA patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3331-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

joint destruction
32
progression joint
16
plain x-ray
16
joint
11
destruction
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
time fdg-pet
8
052 001
8
fdg uptake
8
fdg-pet
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!