A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cervical cytological screening: Assessment of the Fournier ® self-sampling device in a cervical pathology outpatient clinic. | LitMetric

Cervical cytological screening: Assessment of the Fournier ® self-sampling device in a cervical pathology outpatient clinic.

Diagn Cytopathol

Department of Pathology, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil.

Published: October 2015

Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the performance of the Fournier(®) self-sampled device in the cytological diagnosis of cervical precursor or neoplastic lesions. The colposcopy and cervical biopsy were used as the gold standard evaluation.

Method: This was a case-control study performed at a cervical pathology outpatient clinic from January 2008 to October 2009. Samples were obtained through physician-collected mode before a colposcopic evaluation. Liquid-based cytology slides obtained with the device in question were stained using the Papanicolaou method and anti-p16 immunocytochemistry and were analyzed by two pathologists blind to the histological and colposcopic diagnoses.

Results: Diagnostic performance for Fournier device using Papanicolaou technique was sensitivity 41.1% (Pathologist 1-P1) and 52.9% (Pathologist 2-P2) for diagnosing low-grade intraepithelial lesions; for high-grade lesions and cervical cancer, sensitivity was 68.7% (P1) and 75.0% (P2) and specificity was 81.8% (P1) and 73.8% (P2). When using the anti-p16 immunocytochemistry, the sensitivity for diagnosing low-grade intraepithelial lesions was 57.1% (P1) and 62.9% (P2), and the sensitivity was 87.5% (P1) and 93.8% (P2) for high-grade lesions and cancer. The specificity was 75.0% (P1) and 54.4% (P2).

Conclusions: These results show that when used with "blind" physician-collected cytology in an outpatient setting, the Fournier(®) device achieved a sensitivity and specificity comparable to those obtained by the Pap test traditionally collected during a speculum examination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dc.23307DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical pathology
8
pathology outpatient
8
outpatient clinic
8
anti-p16 immunocytochemistry
8
diagnosing low-grade
8
low-grade intraepithelial
8
intraepithelial lesions
8
high-grade lesions
8
cervical
6
device
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!