Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study analyzed the shear strength and fracture characteristics of the interface between zirconia samples and their veneering ceramic compared with a metal-ceramic and a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic control group together with an assessment of the possible relationship between the fracture characteristics and the recorded shear strength. The greatest shear strengths corresponded to the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic control group followed by the metal-ceramic control group, with lesser strengths in the zirconia groups. Since the fractographic study showed cohesive-type failure to predominate in the zirconia samples, it is concluded that improvements are needed in the veneering ceramic and liner used in zirconia restorations.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3873 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!