A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical and antimicrobial efficacy of a controlled-release device containing chlorhexidine in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. | LitMetric

Clinical and antimicrobial efficacy of a controlled-release device containing chlorhexidine in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis

Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Khandagiri Square, Bhubaneswar, 751003, Odisha, India.

Published: October 2015

A controlled-release device (CRD) containing chlorhexidine gluconate, such as PerioCol(™)CG (Eucare Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd,, Chennai, India), for subgingival application has little reported data with clinical as well as antimicrobial efficacy. This study evaluated clinical and subgingival microbial changes on using indigenously developed PerioCol™CG as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. Forty posterior first molar sites having probing pocket depth ≥ 5 mm were selected and divided into two groups, with 20 sites in each group, in a split-mouth design. Group A (test site) was treated with SRP and PerioCol(™)CG, while group B (control site) was treated with SRP alone. Subgingival microbial samples were collected at baseline and 1 month after the initial SRP, while probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL) and gingival index (GI) were recorded at baseline, after 1 month and after 3 months. Microbial detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and Tannerella forsythia (T. forsythia) was done by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A significant improvement was observed in all clinical measures in sites treated with PerioCol(™)CG as compared to the control sites during the study period. Also, there was a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of occurrence of P. gingivalis and T. forsythia after intervention in test sites as compared to control sites. Our data suggest that SRP combined with subgingival administration of PerioCol™CG has a significantly better and prolonged effect compared to SRP alone on the PD, clinical attachment loss and elimination of periodontopathogens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2459-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antimicrobial efficacy
8
controlled-release device
8
treatment chronic
8
chronic periodontitis
8
subgingival microbial
8
site treated
8
treated srp
8
baseline month
8
clinical attachment
8
compared control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!