Objectives: To report changes in the use of the combined first-trimester screen (FTS) in patients classified as high and low risk for fetal aneuploidy, including after introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT).
Methods: A prospectively collected database was reviewed to investigate changes in FTS use before and after American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin No. 77 (Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109:217-227), which recommended that all patients be offered aneuploidy screening, and after NIPT introduction. High-risk patients were classified as 35 years or older at the estimated time of delivery or those with an abnormal prior screen, abnormal ultrasound findings, or family history of aneuploidy. Data were normalized per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations to account for changes in patient number over time. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.
Results: A total of 10,125 FTSs were recorded during the 88-month study period, including 2962 in high-risk patients and 7163 in low-risk patients. The total number of FTSs performed per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations significantly increased after ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77 and significantly decreased after NIPT introduction. In high-risk patients, the total number of FTSs performed per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations significantly increased after ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77 but significantly decreased after NIPT introduction. In contrast, in low-risk patients, the total number of FTSs performed per 100 morphologic ultrasound examinations significantly increased after ACOG Practice Bulletin No.77 but was not statistically different after NIPT introduction.
Conclusions: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin No. 77 significantly increased patient use of FTS. The introduction of NIPT significantly decreased FTS use in the high-risk population but not in the low-risk population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/ultra.34.8.1423 | DOI Listing |
Med Acupunct
December 2024
Third Opinion MD, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Background: Medical education in North America was shaped by a biomedically bounded framework dating back to the early nineteenth century. Yet, one renowned physician, William Osler (1849-1919), seemed to stand out among his contemporaries by promoting acupuncture as a form of treatment. Some physicians in the early 1970s proposed that Osler was ahead of his time by including acupuncture in his medical textbook, (1892).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBull Cancer
January 2025
UE7453 CHELTER, Inserm CIC-501, site Estaing, service de thérapie cellulaire et d'hématologie clinique adulte, service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
The editorial board of the Bulletin du cancer has compiled a summary of the news from 2024 in oncology, based on the main results presented at international congresses or published over the past year. After a year marked by the success of the Olympic Games, the selection of data is presented and discussed in podiums of three main results by topic. Emphasis is placed on studies that have an immediate impact on practice and on data that raise important questions for the year 2025.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Neurol
December 2024
Clinic for Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Purpose: Examining the impact of scoring aids on the accuracy of assessing the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in a standardized trauma scenario (primary outcome). Evaluating physicians' understanding of the GCS assessment and clinical application (secondary outcome).
Materials And Methods: This randomized trial was performed at the simulator center of a Swiss tertiary academic medical hospital.
Nurse Educ
December 2024
By Kathryn Konrad, PhD, RNC-OB, LCCE, FACCE, and Jessica Cotton, DNP, APRN, WHNP-BC, CNM, CNE, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Fran and Earl Ziegler College of Nursing, Oklahoma City and Tulsa, Oklahoma,
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address:
It is well understood that preterm birth accounts for a substantial amount of poor neonatal outcomes. In 2022, preterm birth affected about 1 of every 10 infants born in the United States with complications ranging from mild respiratory distress syndrome to neonatal death. The complexity of the treatment is secondary to the fact that preterm birth is a multifactorial syndrome with intricate sociocultural factors that influence our racially disproportionate poor outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!