Clinical Efficacy of Mudpack Therapy in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Am J Phys Med Rehabil

From the Department of Rehabilitation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China (JX, JL); and Departments of Rehabilitation (JX) and Orthopedics (DW), The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical College, Xuzhou, China.

Published: February 2016

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mudpack therapy for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis and identify the likely factors associated with the high heterogeneity of combined studies.

Design: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials in which mudpack therapy was used to treat knee osteoarthritis.

Results: Ten publications that reported the results from a total of 1010 subjects were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of improvement in joint function at the final follow-up visit suggested, given that the follow-up time was less than 4 mos, that the combined effect size of four studies was -0.30 (-0.62 to 0.02) and the difference did not reach the level of statistical significance. When the follow-up time reached 4 mos, the combined effect size was -1.10 (-2.07 to -0.14) and the difference was significant. The I values of the two groups were 21.4% and 93.8%.

Conclusion: Functional improvement of the knee joint in patients treated with mudpack therapy was not significantly different from that of control subjects at the end of the 4-mo follow-up. The quality of current publications was a factor causing heterogeneity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4704659PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000354DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mudpack therapy
16
clinical efficacy
8
efficacy mudpack
8
knee osteoarthritis
8
randomized controlled
8
follow-up time
8
mos combined
8
combined size
8
mudpack
4
therapy
4

Similar Publications

Objectives: Osteoarthritis has a tremendous socioeconomic impact in terms of drug spending, hospital admissions, work productivity, and temporary or permanent incapacity. Mud therapy has been discussed as potential conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis. However, findings from several trials still remain controversial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study compares mud-pack (MP) and hot-pack (HP) treatments for short-term relief in chronic non-specific neck pain (CNNP) patients, focusing on their effects on sleep, function, depression, and overall quality of life.
  • A total of 70 patients were divided into two groups, receiving either MP or HP along with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and home exercises over three weeks; both groups showed significant improvement in their conditions.
  • Results indicated that while both treatments were effective, MP therapy had superior outcomes in various measures, including pain and quality of life assessments, suggesting better overall benefits for CNNP patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Peloidotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Int J Biometeorol

December 2021

Department of Medical Ecology and Hydroclimatology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

To evaluate the additional effect and safety of peloidotherapy to usual care at short- and middle-term in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). RA patients were recruited in the medical ecology and hydroclimatology department of Istanbul Medical Faculty and were randomized into two parallel groups. Peloidotherapy group was treated with heated mudpack (41-42 °C) on painful and active joints (5 days/week, during 2 weeks) + usual care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether balneotherapy might be effective in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in the short term. This was an open and prospective pilot study. The balneotherapy programme was performed in a spa resort located in Wando Island, Republic of Korea from August 26 2018 to September 1 2018.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to know, based on the available randomized controlled trials, if the non-surgical and non-pharmacological interventions commonly used for knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients are effective and which are the most effective ones.

Material And Methods: RCTs were identified through electronic databases respecting the following terms to guide the search strategy: PICO (Patients - Humans with knee OA; Intervention - Non-surgical and non-pharmacological interventions; Comparison - Pharmacological, surgical, placebo, no intervention, or other non-pharmacological/non-surgical interventions; Outcomes - Pain, physical function and patient global assessment). The methodological quality of the selected publications was evaluated using the PEDro and GRADE scales.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!