This article proposes a checklist to improve statistical reporting in the manuscripts submitted to Public Understanding of Science. Generally, these guidelines will allow the reviewers (and readers) to judge whether the evidence provided in the manuscript is relevant. The article ends with other suggestions for a better statistical quality of the journal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662515595195 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!