An enhanced recovery pathway reduces duration of stay and complications after open pulmonary lobectomy.

Surgery

Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: October 2015

Background: Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) for lung resection. This study estimates the impact of an ERP for lobectomy on duration of stay, complications, and readmissions.

Methods: Patients undergoing open lobectomy were identified from an OR database between 2011 and 2013. Beginning September 2012, all patients were managed according to a 4-day multidisciplinary ERP with written daily patient education treatment plans, multimodal analgesia, early diet, structured mobilization and standardized drain management. Pre-pathway (PRE) and post-pathway (POST) patients were compared in terms of duration of stay, complications, and readmissions.

Results: We identified 234 patients (PRE, 127; POST, 107). Groups were similar with respect to age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and baseline pulmonary function. Compared with the PRE group, the POST group had decreased duration of stay (median, 6 [interquartile range (IQR), 5-7] vs 7 [6-10] days; P < .05), total complications (40 [37%] vs 64 [50%]; P < .05), urinary tract infections (3 [3%] vs 15 [12%]; P < .05), and chest tube duration (median, 4 [IQR, 3-6] vs 5 [4-7] days; P < .05), with no difference in readmissions (7 [7%] vs 6 [5%]; P < .05) or chest tube reinsertion (4 [4%] vs 6 [5%]; P < .05). Decreased duration of stay was driven by patients without complications (median, 5 [IQR, 4-6] vs 6 [5-7] days; P < .05).

Conclusion: Implementation of a multimodal ERP for lobectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay and complications with no difference in readmissions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.04.046DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

duration stay
24
stay complications
16
decreased duration
12
enhanced recovery
8
erp lobectomy
8
chest tube
8
median [iqr
8
difference readmissions
8
duration
7
stay
6

Similar Publications

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of severe pneumonia caused by human bocavirus (HBoV) infection to explore the associated risk factors.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of data from children hospitalized with HBoV pneumonia. Based on the severity of pneumonia, patients were categorized into severe pneumonia and non-severe pneumonia groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

General Endotracheal Anesthesia vs Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Children Undergoing Low-Risk Cardiac Catheterization.

Pediatr Cardiol

January 2025

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

Historically, children undergoing cardiac catheterization have been managed with general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA). However, recent practice has favored general anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). This study compares procedural outcomes in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory (PCCL) for children undergoing low-risk cardiac catheterization with GETA vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols advocate for early enteral feeding to prevent postoperative ileus. Chewing gum acts as a type of sham feeding that triggers the cephalic phase of digestion by stimulating the cephalic vagus nerve. This can enhance gastrointestinal motility and may lead to quicker recovery of gas and bowel movements.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) significantly contribute to knee dysfunction, leading to abnormal biomechanics and accelerated cartilage degeneration. Arthroscopic transtibial pullout and all-inside repair are two commonly used techniques for treating MMPRTs, each with unique advantages and limitations.

Objective: To compare the clinical and functional outcomes of the transtibial pullout and all-inside repair techniques in the treatment of MMPRTs, with a focus on postoperative recovery, knee function, and complications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In recent years, there has been a growing utilization of minimally invasive (MI) techniques, which provide the potential advantages of minimizing surgical stress, post-operative pain, and hospitalization duration. Nevertheless, the existing body of literature primarily comprises of studies conducted at a single medical site, which are of low quality and lack a comprehensive analysis of treatment techniques exclusively focused on spondylolisthesis. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open surgery (OS) spinal fusion outcomes for the treatment of spondylolisthesis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!