A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Transanal total mesorectal excision--a systematic review. | LitMetric

Transanal total mesorectal excision--a systematic review.

Dan Med J

Guldbergsgade 80, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.

Published: July 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard surgery for mid and low rectal cancer, with transanal TME (TaTME) being a newer technique aimed at improving dissection outcomes.
  • A systematic review identified 29 studies involving 336 patients, primarily consisting of case reports, showing low-quality evidence but promising initial results and the main risk being urethral injury.
  • TaTME shows potential benefits for certain patients, but more extensive long-term studies are needed to compare its effectiveness to traditional methods and assess outcomes like recurrence and survival rates.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard surgical treatment for mid and low rectal cancer. The procedure is performed by open, laparoscopic or robotic approaches. Transanal TME (TaTME) is a new procedure that potentially solves some difficulties in the pelvic part of the dissection. We aimed to evaluate the literature on TaTME.

Methods: We performed a systematic search of the literature in the PubMed and Embase databases. Both authors assessed the studies. All publications on TaTME were included with the exception of review articles.

Results: A total of 29 studies (336 patients) were included. Only low-quality evidence is available, and the literature consists of case reports and case series. Studies represent the initial experience of surgeons/centres. No precise indication for TaTME is yet specified other than the presence of mid and low rectal tumours, although the potential advantages seem to be related to a bulky mesorectum in the male pelvis. The preliminary results are encouraging and the most serious complication is urethral injury. The oncological results are acceptable, although the follow-up is short.

Conclusion: TaTME is a feasible approach for mid and low rectal cancers. Long-term follow-up data are awaited regarding functional results, local recurrence and survival, and to facilitate comparison with standard laparoscopic or robotic rectal resections.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mid low
12
low rectal
12
total mesorectal
8
laparoscopic robotic
8
transanal total
4
mesorectal excision--a
4
excision--a systematic
4
systematic review
4
review introduction
4
introduction total
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!