Objectives: To examine whether the benefit of statins varied according to cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV mortality of the treated population.

Design: Meta-analysis and meta-regression of 16 randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Setting: Community and hospital.

Participants: Statin- (n = 59,671) and placebo-treated (n = 59,707) individuals with and without CV disease (mean age 55 to 75).

Measurements: Meta-regression was used to model relative risks (RRs) of major CV events (myocardial infarction and stroke) and total mortality for statins versus placebo as a function of CV and non-CV mortality risks of the study population.

Results: Every 1% increase in 5-year non-CV mortality risk of the study population was associated with a 3.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2 to 6.3%) greater RR of major CV events and a 4.4% (95% CI = 2.1 to 6.9%) greater RR of total mortality. (Higher RRs indicate smaller benefits.) CV mortality was not associated with statin effects (P > .05). In stratified analysis according to CV (≥5.3% vs <5.3%) and non-CV mortality (≥3.8% vs <3.8%) of the study population, statins had little mortality benefit in populations with high non-CV mortality, regardless of CV mortality (random-effects pooled RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.91, for low CV and low non-CV mortality; random-effects pooled RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.06 for low CV and high non-CV mortality; random-effects pooled RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.72 to 0.87 for high CV and low non-CV mortality; random-effects pooled RR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.02 for high CV and high non-CV mortality). The CV event reduction was also attenuated in populations with high non-CV mortality (random-effects pooled RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.75, for low CV and low non-CV mortality; random-effects pooled RR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.66 to 0.81 for low CV and high non-CV mortality; random-effects pooled RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.87 for high CV and low non-CV mortality; random-effects pooled RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.92 for high CV and high non-CV mortality).

Conclusion: Benefits of statins may depend on the non-CV mortality risk of the treated population. This should be confirmed using individual-level data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4509928PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13476DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-cv mortality
12
mortality risk
8
meta-regression randomized
8
major events
8
total mortality
8
mortality
7
statins provide
4
provide benefit
4
benefit populations
4
populations high
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Patients with transthyretin (ATTR) cardiac amyloid infiltration are increasingly diagnosed at earlier disease stages with no heart failure (HF) symptoms and a wide range of cardiac amyloid infiltration.

Objective: To characterize the clinical phenotype and natural history of asymptomatic patients with ATTR cardiac amyloid infiltration.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cohort study analyzed data of all patients at 12 international centers for amyloidosis from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Polypharmacy (i.e., treatment with ≥ 5 drugs) is common in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and has been associated with suboptimal management and worse outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: In heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the early diagnosis and proper treatment of comorbidities (CMs) are of fundamental relevance. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of CMs among real-world patients requiring hospitalisation for HFrEF and to investigate the effect of CMs on the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and on all-cause mortality (ACM). : The data of a consecutive HFrEF patient cohort hospitalised for HF between 2021 and 2024 were analysed retrospectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: The temporal changes in clinical profiles and outcomes of high-risk myocardial infarction survivors enrolled in clinical trials are poorly described. This study compares mortality rates, baseline characteristics, and the prognostic impact of therapies among participants of the VALIANT and PARADISE-MI trials.

Methods And Results: Exclusively VALIANT participants who matched the inclusion criteria of the PARADISE-MI trial were included in the analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is a non-invasive method that improves cardiovascular risk assessment for individuals without symptoms and is increasingly linked to non-cardiovascular diseases and overall mortality.
  • The review emphasizes a strong connection between CACS and various non-CV diseases like COPD, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, suggesting CACS could help with early diagnosis and risk evaluation.
  • Further research is needed to determine effective CACS cutoff values and enhance integration of this scoring into healthcare for better preventive care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!