Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women. However, the exact cause(s) of breast cancer still remains unknown. Early detection, precise identification of women at risk, and application of appropriate disease prevention measures are by far the most effective way to tackle breast cancer. There are more than 70 common genetic susceptibility factors included in the current non-image-based risk prediction models (e.g., the Gail and the Tyrer-Cuzick models). Image-based risk factors, such as mammographic densities and parenchymal patterns, have been established as biomarkers but have not been fully incorporated in the risk prediction models used for risk stratification in screening and/or measuring responsiveness to preventive approaches. Within computer aided mammography, automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methods have been developed for estimation of breast tissue composition to facilitate mammographic risk assessment. This paper presents a comprehensive review of automatic mammographic tissue segmentation methodologies developed over the past two decades and the evidence for risk assessment/density classification using segmentation. The aim of this review is to analyse how engineering advances have progressed and the impact automatic mammographic tissue segmentation has in a clinical environment, as well as to understand the current research gaps with respect to the incorporation of image-based risk factors in non-image-based risk prediction models.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481086PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/276217DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

automatic mammographic
16
breast cancer
12
risk prediction
12
prediction models
12
mammographic tissue
12
tissue segmentation
12
risk
9
review automatic
8
non-image-based risk
8
image-based risk
8

Similar Publications

Enhancing Radiologist Reading Performance by Ordering Screening Mammograms Based on Characteristics That Promote Visual Adaptation.

Radiology

October 2024

From the Departments of Medical Imaging (J.J.J.G., S.D.V., I.S.) and IQ Health (M.J.M.B.), Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (K.M.D.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Haga Teaching Hospital, Den Haag, the Netherlands (J.K.v.R.); Department of Radiology, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands (A.F.v.R.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (J.B.H.); Department of Radiology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands (D.B.N.); Department of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (L.E.M.D.); Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, Calif (C.K.A.); Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nev (M.A.W.); Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (M.J.M.B., I.S.); and Technical Medicine Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands (I.S.).

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to see if the order in which mammograms are read, based on their characteristics, could help radiologists spot abnormalities more efficiently, particularly focusing on factors like breast density and visual adaptation.
  • A total of 150 mammograms were analyzed by 13 radiologists using three reading methods: random order, increasing volumetric breast density (VBD), and self-supervised learning (SSL) grouping.
  • Results indicated that readings organized by increasing VBD led to slightly better performance and reduced reading time compared to random order, without affecting sensitivity and specificity significantly.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Two-Dimensional Mammography Imaging Techniques for Screening Women with Silicone Breast Implants: A Pilot Phantom Study.

Bioengineering (Basel)

August 2024

Department of Radiology, PARCC UMRS 970, INSERM, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of three two-dimensional (2D) mammographic acquisition techniques on image quality and radiation dose in the presence of silicone breast implants (BIs). Then, we propose and validate a new International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) phantom to reproduce these techniques. Images were acquired on a single Hologic Selenia Dimensions unit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Capability and reliability of deep learning models to make density predictions on low-dose mammograms.

J Med Imaging (Bellingham)

July 2024

University of Manchester, School of Health Sciences, Division of Imaging, Informatics and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Purpose: Breast density is associated with the risk of developing cancer and can be automatically estimated using deep learning models from digital mammograms. Our aim is to evaluate the capacity and reliability of such models to predict density from low-dose mammograms taken to enable risk estimates for younger women.

Approach: We trained deep learning models on standard-dose and simulated low-dose mammograms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objectives: In the last decade, there has been a growing interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) systems to breast cancer assessment, including breast density evaluation. However, few models have been developed to integrate textual mammographic reports and mammographic images. Our aims are (1) to generate a natural language processing (NLP)-based AI system, (2) to evaluate an external image-based software, and (3) to develop a multimodal system, using the late fusion approach, by integrating image and text inferences for the automatic classification of breast density according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines in mammograms and radiological reports.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep transfer learning for detection of breast arterial calcifications on mammograms: a comparative study.

Eur Radiol Exp

July 2024

Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.

Article Synopsis
  • Breast arterial calcifications (BAC) found in mammograms may indicate cardiovascular disease risk, and a study evaluated the performance of eleven pretrained CNNs, specifically focusing on their ability to detect BAC.
  • The research analyzed mammograms from 1,493 women to classify images as BAC or non-BAC, using metrics like AUC-ROC and F-score to assess the effectiveness of the CNNs, with models like VGG and MobileNet showing promising results.
  • The findings suggest that deep transfer learning can effectively automate BAC detection, with shallower networks requiring less training time while still yielding strong performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!