Importance: Little information is available on the long-term clinical outcome of patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT).
Objective: To assess the incidence rates of bleeding, thrombotic events, and mortality in a large international cohort of patients with SVT.
Design, Setting, And Participants: A prospective cohort study was conducted beginning May 2, 2008, and completed January 30, 2014, at hospital-based centers specialized in the management of thromboembolic disorders; a 2-year follow-up period was completed January 30, 2014, and data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2014, to February 28, 2015. Participants included 604 consecutive patients with objectively diagnosed SVT; there were no exclusion critieria. Information was gathered on baseline characteristics, risk factors, and antithrombotic treatment. Clinical outcomes during the follow-up period were documented and reviewed by a central adjudication committee.
Main Outcomes And Measures: Major bleeding, defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; bleeding requiring hospitalization; thrombotic events, including venous and arterial thrombosis; and all-cause mortality.
Results: Of the 604 patients (median age, 54 years; 62.6% males), 21 (3.5%) did not complete follow-up. The most common risk factors for SVT were liver cirrhosis (167 of 600 patients [27.8%]) and solid cancer (136 of 600 [22.7%]); the most common sites of thrombosis were the portal vein (465 of 604 [77.0%]) and the mesenteric veins (266 of 604 [44.0%]). Anticoagulation was administered to 465 patients in the entire cohort (77.0%) with a mean duration of 13.9 months; 175 of the anticoagulant group (37.6%) received parenteral treatment only, and 290 patients (62.4%) were receiving vitamin K antagonists. The incidence rates (reported with 95% CIs) were 3.8 per 100 patient-years (2.7-5.2) for major bleeding, 7.3 per 100 patient-years (5.8-9.3) for thrombotic events, and 10.3 per 100 patient-years (8.5-12.5) for all-cause mortality. During anticoagulant treatment, these rates were 3.9 per 100 patient-years (2.6-6.0) for major bleeding and 5.6 per 100 patient-years (3.9-8.0) for thrombotic events. After treatment discontinuation, rates were 1.0 per 100 patient-years (0.3-4.2) and 10.5 per 100 patient-years (6.8-16.3), respectively. The highest rates of major bleeding and thrombotic events during the whole study period were observed in patients with cirrhosis (10.0 per 100 patient-years [6.6-15.1] and 11.3 per 100 patient-years [7.7-16.8], respectively); the lowest rates were in patients with SVT secondary to transient risk factors (0.5 per 100 patient-years [0.1-3.7] and 3.2 per 100 patient-years [1.4-7.0], respectively).
Conclusions And Relevance: Most patients with SVT have a substantial long-term risk of thrombotic events. In patients with cirrhosis, this risk must be balanced against a similarly high risk of major bleeding. Anticoagulant treatment appears to be safe and effective in most patients with SVT.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3184 | DOI Listing |
Res Pract Thromb Haemost
January 2025
Division of Hematology and Hemostasis, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Background: The Vienna Prediction Model (VPM) identifies patients with a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis of the leg and/or pulmonary embolism who have a low recurrence risk and may, therefore, not benefit from extended-phase anticoagulation.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with a predicted high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Methods And Results: We prospectively followed 266 patients in whom the VPM had predicted a recurrence risk of more than 5.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 1201 E Marshall St #4-100, 23298, Richmond, VA, USA.
Routine preventive care (RPC) services are recommended for people with HIV, who have higher risk of certain preventable conditions. We used a pooled cross-section of patient-years to examine receipt of 5 annual RPC services among Medicaid enrollees in the US South. Data were person-level administrative claims (Medicaid Analytic eXtract, 2008-2012) and county-level characteristics for 16 Southern states plus District of Columbia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeart Rhythm
January 2025
Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Ontario, Canada.
Background: The Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial enrolled patients with vascular disease, but excluded patients requiring oral anticoagulation.
Objective: To explore the clinical significance of a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF) during follow-up.
Methods: New AF was identified from hospitalization, study drug discontinuation and adverse event reports.
Clin Cardiol
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine and CHI Health, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Background: Clinical trials support dronedarone use for atrial fibrillation (AF) following catheter ablation (CA); however, comparative data on health care resource utilization (HCRU) with other antiarrhythmic drugs are lacking.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of Merative MarketScan databases (January 01, 2012-March 31, 2020) comparatively assessed HCRU in US adults with AF who received dronedarone or sotalol post-CA. Patients with ≥ 12-months' pre-CA data were followed from post-CA index treatment to disenrollment, death, or study end.
Eur J Clin Invest
January 2025
Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University, and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist, but the impact of clinical phenotypes of CAD on outcomes in AF patients in the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant drugs (NOACs) era is less well understood.
Methods: This was a post-hoc of the GLORIA-AF registry, a global, multicenter, prospective AF registry study. Patients were divided into three groups: prior history of myocardial infarction (MI)/unstable angina group (Group 1); stable angina group (Group 2); and a control group without stable angina or history of MI/unstable angina.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!