Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a flexible multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist against the effectiveness of a microdose flare-up GnRH agonist combined with a flexible multidose GnRH antagonist protocol in poor responders to in vitro fertilization (IVF).
Study Design: A retrospective study in Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF Center, for 131 poor responders in the intracytoplasmic sperm injection-embryo transfer (ICSI-ET) program between January 2006 and November 2012. The groups were compared to the patients' characteristics, controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) results, and laboratory results.
Results: Combination protocol was applied to 46 patients (group 1), and a single protocol was applied to 85 patients (group 2). In group 1, the duration of the treatment was longer and the dose of FSH was higher. The cycle cancellation rate was significantly higher in group 2 (26.1% versus 38.8%). A significant difference was not observed with respect to the number and quality of oocytes and embryos or to the number of embryos transferred. There were no statistically significant differences in the hCG positivity (9.5% versus 9.4%) or the clinical pregnancy rates (7.1% versus 10.6%).
Conclusion: The combination protocol does not provide additional efficacy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487334 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/970163 | DOI Listing |
BJR Case Rep
July 2024
Department of Clinical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood HA6 2RN, United Kingdom.
Reirradiation in recurrent head and neck cancer presents a considerable clinical challenge in radiation oncology. Though technically feasible due to advanced treatment delivery and planning techniques, confidence in delivering such treatments is not universal and patient selection is critical. Radiotherapy planning in reirradiation cases presents a complex technical challenge owing to the often-considerable overlap of dose from a patient's first treatment plan.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPharmaceutics
May 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
The standard multi-dose nasal spray pump features an integrated actuator and nozzle, which inevitably causes a retraction of the nozzle tip during application. The retraction stroke is around 5.5 mm and drastically reduces the nozzle's insertion depth, which further affects the initial nasal spray deposition and subsequent translocation, potentially increasing drug wastes and dosimetry variability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Pharm
December 2023
Department of Chemistry, The University of Kansas, Lawrence KS, USA. Electronic address:
Multidose formulations have patient-centric advantages over single-dose formats. A major challenge in developing multidose formulations is the prevention of microbial growth that can potentially be introduced during multiple drawings. The incorporation of antimicrobial preservatives (APs) is a common approach to inhibit this microbial growth.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pharm Sci
April 2022
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, 2030 Becker Drive, Lawrence, Kansas 66047, USA. Electronic address:
Eight antimicrobial preservatives used in parenteral multidose formulations (thimerosal, 2-phenoxy ethanol, phenol, benzyl alcohol, m-cresol, chlorobutanol, methyl paraben, propyl paraben) were examined for their effects on the storage stability (4 °C, 25 °C) of an Alhydrogel® (AH) adjuvanted formulation of the non-replicating rotavirus vaccine (NRRV) recombinant P[4] protein antigen. The stability of AH-adsorbed P[4] was monitored for antigen-antibody binding, conformational stability, and antigen-adjuvant interaction via competitive ELISA, DSC, and SDS-PAGE, respectively. There was an unexpected correlation between increasing storage stability of the AH-adsorbed P[4] and preservative hydrophobicity (log P) (e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEndoscopy
July 2022
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States.
Background: Endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are measured using the validated EoE Endoscopic Reference Score (EREFS); however, a threshold for treatment response has not been defined. We aimed to determine a cut-point for endoscopic response as measured by EREFS.
Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial comparing budesonide slurry with swallowed fluticasone multidose inhaler for initial treatment of EoE.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!