Pressure drop of filtering facepiece respirators: How low should we go?

Int J Occup Med Environ Health

3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America (3M Personal Safety Division).

Published: December 2016

Introduction: This study was undertaken to determine the mean peak filter resistance to airflow (Rfilter) encountered by subjects while wearing prototype filtering facepiece respirators (PRs) with low Rfilter during nasal and oral breathing at sedentary and low-moderate work rates.

Material And Methods: In-line pressure transducer measurements of mean Rfilteracross PRs with nominal Rfilter of 29.4 Pa, 58.8 Pa and 88.2 Pa (measured at 85 l/min constant airflow) were obtained during nasal and oral breathing at sedentary and low-moderate work rates for 10 subjects.

Results: The mean Rfilter for the 29.4 PR was significantly lower than the other 2 PRs (p < 0.000), but there were no significant differences in mean Rfilter between the PRs with 58.8 and 88.2 Pa filter resistance (p > 0.05). The mean Rfilter was greater for oral versus nasal breathing and for exercise compared to sedentary activity (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Mean oral and nasal Rfilter for all 3 PRs was at, or below, the minimal threshold level for detection of inspiratory resistance (the 58.8-74.5 Pa/l×s-1), which may account for the previously-reported lack of significant subjective or physiological differences when wearing PRs with these low Rfilter. Lowering filtering facepiece respirator Rfilter below 88.2 Pa (measured at 85 l/min constant airflow) may not result in additional subjective or physiological benefit to the wearer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4499853PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00153DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

filtering facepiece
12
rfilter
9
facepiece respirators
8
filter resistance
8
prs low
8
low rfilter
8
nasal oral
8
oral breathing
8
breathing sedentary
8
sedentary low-moderate
8

Similar Publications

Developing and overseeing Respiratory Protection Programs (RPPs) is crucial for ensuring effective respirator use among employees. To date, a gap exists in research that focuses on elastomeric half mask respirators (EHMRs) as the primary respirator in health delivery settings which would necessitate additional considerations in RPPs beyond the more common N95 filtering facepiece respirators. This paper presents lessons learned during a one-year impact evaluation with healthcare and first responder settings that received EHMRs from the Strategic National Stockpile in 2021 and 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Unlabelled: There is an ongoing trend toward more frequent and multiple crises. While there is a clear need for behaviors to become more sustainable to address the climate crisis, how to achieve this against the backdrop of other crises is unknown. Using a sample of 18,805 participants from the UK, we performed a survey experiment to investigate if communication messages provide a useful tool in nudging intentions toward improved sustainability in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the effects of wearing N95 masks compared to loop/surgical masks on healthcare workers during long shifts, focusing on symptoms like fatigue and blood gas levels.
  • It involved a survey and measurements of carbon dioxide and oxygen levels before and after shifts, with 39 subjects participating.
  • Results indicated that those wearing N95 masks reported significantly higher fatigue levels, but no meaningful differences were found in arterial blood gas parameters between the two mask types.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: During shortages, elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs) are an alternative to reusing N95 filtering facepiece respirators but require between-use disinfection. The objectives of this study were to (a) measure microbial reductions on EHMR surfaces under laboratory conditions by a standardized procedure using wipes impregnated with health care disinfectants and to (b) measure microbial reductions on EHMRs disinfected by volunteer health care providers.

Method: We inoculated EHMR (Honeywell model RU8500) surfaces with spores, and bacteriophages MS2 and Φ6, and disinfected them using two wipes with hydrogen peroxide (HP), alcohols, and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!