A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Automatic planning of atrial fibrillation ablation lines using landmark-constrained nonrigid registration. | LitMetric

Catheter ablation is a common treatment option for drug-refractory atrial fibrillation. In many cases, pulmonary vein isolation is the treatment of choice. With current fluoro overlay methods or electroanatomic mapping systems, it is possible to visualize three-dimensional (3-D) anatomy as well as target ablation lines to provide additional context information. Today, however, these lines need to be set manually before the procedure by the physician, which may interrupt the clinical workflow. As a solution, we present an automatic approach for the planning of ablation target lines. Our method works on surface models extracted from 3-D images. To propose suitable ablation lines, a reference model annotated with reference ablation lines is nonrigidly registered to the model segmented from a new patient's 3-D data. After registration, the reference plan is transferred from the reference anatomy to the individual patient anatomy. Due to the high anatomical variations observed in clinical practice, additional landmark constraints are employed in the registration process to increase the robustness of our approach. We evaluated our method on 43 clinical datasets by benchmarking it against professionally planned ablation lines and achieved an average error over all datasets of [Formula: see text]. A qualitative evaluation of the ablation planning lines matched clinical expectations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4478762PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.1.1.015002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ablation lines
20
atrial fibrillation
8
ablation
8
lines
8
automatic planning
4
planning atrial
4
fibrillation ablation
4
lines landmark-constrained
4
landmark-constrained nonrigid
4
nonrigid registration
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!