Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives/hypothesis: Postendoscopic sinus surgery corticosteroid administration reduces polyp formation, inflammation, and adhesions. Steroid-eluting bioabsorbable intranasal devices (SEBID) are novel interventions thought to improve local drug delivery while minimizing systemic side effects. The primary aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bioabsorbable SEBIDs. The secondary aim is to inform clinical recommendations and to introduce clinicians to this novel technology.
Study Design: MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database were searched according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Methods: Original articles assessing the efficacy of SEBIDs inserted after endoscopic sinus surgery. For each study, we recorded the efficacy endpoints and safety outcomes.
Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria from 737 initial articles identified, including five prospective randomized controlled trials and two prospective single-cohort studies involving 394 sinuses within treatment arms. Patients were followed up for 2 to 6 months. Six studies demonstrated SEBID efficacy with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Steroid-eluting bioabsorbable intranasal devices were effective in reducing adhesion formation, polyp formation, inflammation, Lund-Kennedy scores, and perioperative sinus endoscopy scores. The devices improved patient-reported outcomes and olfaction while reducing postoperative interventions. They were not associated with adverse events and pose no ocular safety risk. Complications in three SEBID applications were reported.
Conclusion: There is limited data available on SEBIDS; further studies are required to determine whether they are safe and effective adjuncts postendoscopic sinus surgery. Future studies are needed to optimize the dosing regimen, compare devices, and provide long-term outcomes. Steroid-eluting bioabsorbable intranasal devices may tentatively be incorporated into future evidence-based practice.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25460 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!