Thinking All Wrong about How You Die.

Hastings Cent Rep

Published: August 2015

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hast.473DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

thinking wrong
4
wrong die
4
thinking
1
die
1

Similar Publications

What Is Diagnostic Stewardship?

J Appl Lab Med

January 2025

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Background: Diagnostic stewardship is a set of clinically based changes to the ordering, processing, and reporting of diagnostic tests designed to improve patient outcomes (through decreased inappropriate testing, and reduced patient harm from wrong, delayed, or missed diagnosis). It shares a common philosophy with laboratory stewardship but has some key differences.

Content: Laboratory stewardship focuses primarily on pre- and post-analytical components of the testing process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

From'grave diggers' to a 'Trauma System for Ireland', the history of Irish orthopaedics is a unique and fascinating story. This story has developed over decades and centuries, with many late and great surgeons and trainers playing major roles in developing our orthopaedic services nationally, as we know them today. The authors acknowledge that it would be wrong to think that a 1500-word review could provide an in-depth, yet comprehensive, discussion of all topics past and present of celebration, deliberation and further debate, related to orthopaedic surgery in Ireland.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent work has supported the role of reasoning in third-party moral judgment of harm transgressions. In particular, reasoning may increase the weight of intention in moral judgment, especially following accidental harm, a situation that presumably requires judges to balance considerations about the outcome endured by a victim on the one hand and considerations about an agent's intention to cause harm on the other hand. Three preregistered lab-based studies aimed to test the causal contribution of reasoning to moral judgment of harm transgressions using experimental manipulations borrowed from the reasoning literature: time pressure (Experiment 1), cognitive load (Experiment 2), and priming (Experiment 3).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In a dynamic healthcare environment, patient safety is crucial. A "Conscious Actions Reduce Errors" (C.A.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Korean and American adolescents' judgments of group-based inequalities.

Acta Psychol (Amst)

November 2024

Graduate School of Education, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States of America. Electronic address:

The current study examined how adolescents from different cultural backgrounds perceive and reason about group-based inequalities. Korean (N = 84, 42 females) and American (N = 72, 36 females) adolescents, aged 12 to 17, evaluated resource distribution inequalities in school contexts among social groups differentiated by social class, race, and gender. Across both cultures, nearly all adolescents found race and gender inequalities unacceptable based on moral concerns for equality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!