A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Permanent teeth pulpotomy survival analysis: retrospective follow-up. | LitMetric

Permanent teeth pulpotomy survival analysis: retrospective follow-up.

J Dent

Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Prédio 6, sala 507, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, postal code: 90619-900. Electronic address:

Published: September 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated the success rates of pulpotomies across different age groups and identified risk factors influencing these outcomes.
  • Results showed that factors like age did not significantly impact success rates, but the formation of a dentin bridge was beneficial, while resin composite restorations had a notably higher failure rate.
  • The findings suggest that pulpotomy can be effective for both young and older patients, but caution is advised when using direct composite restorations post-procedure.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study is to evaluate risk factors influencing the success rates of pulpotomies both in young and adult populations.

Methods: Pulpotomies (n=273) performed by a single endodontic specialist were analyzed, and data on success rates were collected. Additionally, possible explanatory variables were noted such as: age, gender, clinical findings (teeth, type of restoration after pulpotomy), radiographic findings (dentin bridge formation) and systemic conditions. The follow-up period varied from 1 to 29 years, and the results were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and also by Cox regression.

Results: Age at the time of pulpotomy ranged from 8 to 79 and had not influenced the success rates (p=0.35). The formation of dentin bridge had a strong protective effect (hazard ratio-HR=0.16, p<0.001). The prosthetic crown restorations following pulpotomy had the smallest failure rate, and amalgam has not increased the risk of failure significantly in relation to prosthesis. Resin composite restorations following pulpotomy increased in 263% the risk of failure (HR=3.63, p<0.001).

Conclusion: This study allowed inferences that pulpotomy may be a successful treatment at any age, and not only for young permanent teeth. It was also possible to conclude that the use of direct composite restorations following pulpotomies is associated with higher failure rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.06.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

success rates
12
dentin bridge
8
permanent teeth
4
teeth pulpotomy
4
pulpotomy survival
4
survival analysis
4
analysis retrospective
4
retrospective follow-up
4
follow-up objectives
4
objectives aim
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!