Background: There are currently inadequate data on whether "late restenosis" occurs after paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty for in-stent restenosis (ISR) lesions.

Objectives: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of PCB angioplasty, we investigated serial clinical and angiographic outcomes after PCB angioplasty for ISR lesions.

Methods: Between September 2008 and December 2012, PCB angioplasty was performed in 468 patients with 550 ISR lesions (bare-metal stent restenosis [BMS-ISR]: 114 lesions, drug-eluting stent restenosis [DES-ISR]: 436 lesions). Two serial angiographic follow-ups were routinely planned for the patients (at 6 and 18 months after the procedure).

Results: Early follow-up (6 months) angiography was performed for 488 lesions (89%), and recurrent restenosis occurred in 13 lesions (13.0%) in the BMS-ISR group and in 82 lesions (21.1%) in the DES-ISR group. Target lesion revascularization was performed for 7 lesions (7.0%) in the BMS-ISR group and 54 lesions (13.9%) in the DES-ISR group. Late follow-up (18 months) angiography was performed for 377 (88%) of the remaining 427 lesions (excluding target lesion revascularization lesions), and late restenosis was found in 2 lesions (2.5%) in the BMS-ISR group and 50 lesions (16.8%) in the DES-ISR group. Delayed late lumen loss was significantly larger in the DES-ISR group. Previous stent size ≤2.5 mm, percentage diameter stenosis after the procedure, and in-stent occlusion lesion were independent predictors of early restenosis. DES-ISR, percentage diameter stenosis at early follow-up, and hemodialysis were independent predictors of late restenosis.

Conclusions: Late restenosis occurs after PCB angioplasty for DES-ISR lesions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pcb angioplasty
20
des-isr group
16
lesions
13
late restenosis
12
stent restenosis
12
bms-isr group
12
group lesions
12
paclitaxel-coated balloon
8
drug-eluting stent
8
restenosis
8

Similar Publications

Paclitaxel can inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, and reduce the risk of vascular restenosis after balloon dilation. Our study investigated the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) treatment for diabetic subpatellar artery disease. In this study, 140 patients with diabetic subknee arterial disease treated in our hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as the study objects, and were divided into the control group (conventional balloon interventionization angioplasty) and the observation group (PCB interventionization angioplasty), with 70 cases in each group according to the differences in previous balloon interventionization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * In this randomized controlled trial involving 446 patients, the SurVeil PCB showed a primary safety rate of 91.8% and a primary efficacy rate of 82.2%, while the IN.PACT Admiral had rates of 89.8% and 85.9%, respectively.
  • * The results indicate that the SurVeil PCB is a safe and effective treatment option, demonstrating non-inferiority to the IN.PACT Admiral PCB over a 24-month period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) are currently used for treating coronary lesions, but researchers are exploring sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) as an alternative to see if they perform similarly.
  • A study involving 70 patients across Germany and Switzerland tested the SCB against PCB, focusing on their effectiveness in preventing late lumen loss (LLL) in arteries after 6 months.
  • Results indicated no significant differences between the two treatments in terms of LLL and clinical outcomes, suggesting that SCBs can be a viable alternative to PCBs in coronary interventions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Both paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) are indicated for the treatment of de novo small-vessel coronary lesions. Since the evidence comparing these two types of devices is limited, we undertook a meta-analysis on this issue. Our meta-analysis compared the efficacy of PCB vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We previously showed non-inferiority of a low-dose paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) with citrate excipient (Agent PCB) as compared to normal-dose iopromide excipient (SeQuent Please PCB) in terms of angiographic and clinical endpoints at 12 months. The long-term clinical efficacy and safety of Agent PCB is not defined.

Methods: 262 patients (323 DES-ISR lesions) were enrolled in this study and treated with either Agent PCB (125 patients, 151 lesions) in the ISAR-DESIRE 3a trial or with SeQuent Please PCB (137 patients, 172 lesions) in the setting of the randomized ISAR-DESIRE 3 trial with similar in- and exclusion criteria serving as historical control arm.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!