Background: In clinical practice, we progressively rely on biomarkers, without estimating the pretest probability. There is not enough support for the use of cardiac troponin (cTn) I in the management of noncardiac patients. We studied the rate at which this test was ordered, the prevalence of detection of a positive result in noncardiac patients, and the impact of this incidental finding on clinical management.

Methodology: Patients admitted from December 2011 to 2013 to our community hospital with diagnosis of noncardiac disease who had positive cTn were included. Data collected included final diagnosis, patient disposition, cardiac monitoring, cardiology consult, and cardiac biomarker testing.

Results: Cardiac troponin I was ordered for 1700 patients in our emergency department. Seven hundred fifty patients had a positive cTn. Of the 750 patients, 412 had a positive cTn without any clinical suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome. An incidental finding of a positive cTn leads to ordering of cTn on average 4 times during admission, cardiac monitoring of 379 (91.99%) patients for at least 1 day, and a cardiac consultation for 268 (63.65%) of these patients. None of these patients was candidates for an invasive cardiac intervention. Seventy-eight (19.17%) patients were admitted to the cardiac care unit and subsequently transferred to the medical intensive care unit.

Conclusions: A positive cTn in patients diagnosed with a nonacute coronary syndrome was associated with increased cardiac biomarker testing, telemetry monitoring, and cardiology consults. This study supports adherence to national guidelines for the use of cTn, to reduce hospital cost and resource utilization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive ctn
20
patients
12
coronary syndrome
12
cardiac
9
pretest probability
8
acute coronary
8
cardiac troponin
8
ctn
8
noncardiac patients
8
incidental finding
8

Similar Publications

Assessing modified HEART scores with high-sensitivity troponin for low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.

Intern Emerg Med

December 2024

Department of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA.

The accuracy of using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) scores with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) to risk stratify emergency department (ED) chest pain patients remains uncertain. We aim to compare the performance accuracy of determining major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among three modified HEART (mHEART) scores with the use of hs-cTn to risk stratify ED chest pain patients. This retrospective single-center observational study included ED patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who had HEAR scores calculated and at least one hs-cTnI result.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Study Objective: This study aimed to determine whether myocardial infarction (MI) could be safely diagnosed or excluded within 30 min instead of 1 h.

Methods: This single-center, prospective, observational study included patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain. Patients underwent a thorough evaluation, including medical history, physical exams, ECG, and serial hs-cTn T measurements at 0, 30, and 60 min.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study is focused on the increasing issue of hospitalizations related to opioid use disorder (OUD), comparing standard addiction consultation services to a specific treatment involving a long-lasting buprenorphine injection to improve post-hospital care engagement.
  • Patients in six U.S. hospitals who were not on medication for OUD before admission will be randomly assigned either to continue usual care or receive a single dose of a 28-day extended-release buprenorphine upon discharge.
  • Outcomes will be assessed at multiple follow-up points, with the primary goal of seeing if the XR-BUP group shows higher engagement in ongoing treatment 34 days after leaving the hospital, while also monitoring for safety and various secondary effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) is a tool used to assess daily mistreatment faced by racialized individuals, particularly in Canadian HIV research focused on African, Caribbean, and/or Black (ACB) and other racialized women.
  • The study analyzed data from 504 women (including those living with HIV) to assess the validity and reliability of the EDS across different racial/ethnic groups and HIV statuses through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multigroup-CFA (mCFA).
  • The findings indicate that the EDS provides comparable estimates of racial discrimination across various groups, making it suitable for further research on the health impacts of discrimination among ACB and other racialized women in Canada, despite some redundancy in item pairs
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * The study reported common CVD symptoms such as chest pain and new hypertension, with diagnoses including unstable angina, myocardial infarction, and myocarditis in a small number of cases.
  • * Echocardiography showed pericardial effusion in 31.1% of patients, and abnormal T-wave changes were the most noted ECG findings, indicating a high incidence of cardiovascular issues among those infected with COVID-19.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!