Background: In clinical practice, we progressively rely on biomarkers, without estimating the pretest probability. There is not enough support for the use of cardiac troponin (cTn) I in the management of noncardiac patients. We studied the rate at which this test was ordered, the prevalence of detection of a positive result in noncardiac patients, and the impact of this incidental finding on clinical management.
Methodology: Patients admitted from December 2011 to 2013 to our community hospital with diagnosis of noncardiac disease who had positive cTn were included. Data collected included final diagnosis, patient disposition, cardiac monitoring, cardiology consult, and cardiac biomarker testing.
Results: Cardiac troponin I was ordered for 1700 patients in our emergency department. Seven hundred fifty patients had a positive cTn. Of the 750 patients, 412 had a positive cTn without any clinical suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome. An incidental finding of a positive cTn leads to ordering of cTn on average 4 times during admission, cardiac monitoring of 379 (91.99%) patients for at least 1 day, and a cardiac consultation for 268 (63.65%) of these patients. None of these patients was candidates for an invasive cardiac intervention. Seventy-eight (19.17%) patients were admitted to the cardiac care unit and subsequently transferred to the medical intensive care unit.
Conclusions: A positive cTn in patients diagnosed with a nonacute coronary syndrome was associated with increased cardiac biomarker testing, telemetry monitoring, and cardiology consults. This study supports adherence to national guidelines for the use of cTn, to reduce hospital cost and resource utilization.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.006 | DOI Listing |
Intern Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA.
The accuracy of using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) scores with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) to risk stratify emergency department (ED) chest pain patients remains uncertain. We aim to compare the performance accuracy of determining major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among three modified HEART (mHEART) scores with the use of hs-cTn to risk stratify ED chest pain patients. This retrospective single-center observational study included ED patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who had HEAR scores calculated and at least one hs-cTnI result.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Study Objective: This study aimed to determine whether myocardial infarction (MI) could be safely diagnosed or excluded within 30 min instead of 1 h.
Methods: This single-center, prospective, observational study included patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain. Patients underwent a thorough evaluation, including medical history, physical exams, ECG, and serial hs-cTn T measurements at 0, 30, and 60 min.
Addict Sci Clin Pract
December 2024
Department of Medicine, Addiction Medicine Section, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.
Can J Public Health
December 2024
Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Br J Cardiol
June 2024
Associated Professor of Cardiology, Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Hossein Hospital Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Imam Ave., Shahroud 36169-11151, Iran.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!