[Prognostic Value of Prednisone Response in CCLG-ALL 2008].

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi

Institute of Hematology & Hospital of Blood Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin 300020, China. E-mail:

Published: June 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how well children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) respond to prednisone treatment as a predictor of their prognosis.
  • A total of 598 newly diagnosed ALL patients were treated with prednisone and were divided into two groups based on their lymphoblast counts on day 8: good responders (PGR) and poor responders (PPR).
  • The results showed that PPR patients had poorer outcomes, including lower event-free survival rates and higher relapse rates, suggesting that PPR status indicates a higher risk and worse overall prognosis.*

Article Abstract

Objective: To ovaluate the prognostic value of prednisone response in treatment regimes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Methods: A total of 598 newly diagnosed ALL patients were enrolled and received prednisone pre-treatment. Based on the peripheral lymphoblast count on day 8, these patients were divided into 2 groups: prednisone good response (PGR) and prednisone poor response (PPR). PPR patients were classified into high risk group immediately and then received intensed chemotherapy. The all enrolled patients were followed up and the clinical features and treatment outcomes of the two groups were analyzed.

Results: Compared with PGR group, PPR group had different characteristics. They were older in age and had higher initial white blood cell count (P<0.05). T-cell ALL (T-ALL) and Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL (Ph+ ALL) were frequent in PPR group (P<0.05). Event-free survival (EFS) rate of PPR group was significantly lower than that of PGR group (P<0.05). 2 year event-free survival(EFS) rate of PGR group was (88.3±1.5)%, while the 2-year EFS rate of PPR group was (58.4±5.3)%. 5 year EFS rates of PGR and PPR were (80.8±2.1)% and (53.4±6.0)%, respectively. The EFS rate of PPR group was falling rapidly within 2 years. PPR group had higher relapse rate, and most relapses occurred within 18 months (P<0.05). PPR group had more high incidence of minimal residual disease (MRD) both on day 33 and on week 12 (P<0.05). No significant difference of EFS and relapse time was found between PPR and high risk PGR patients (P>0.05). In multi-variate regression analysis, the PPR, the presence of BCR-ABL1 and MLL were significantly unfavorable factors (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Prednisone response has been confirmed to be still great prognostic value and PPR children patients have poor outcomes generally. It is likely that the response to prednisone does not make much sense to high risk ALL patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2015.03.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prednisone response
8
[prognostic prednisone
4
response
4
response cclg-all
4
cclg-all 2008]
4
2008] objective
4
objective ovaluate
4
ovaluate prognostic
4
prednisone
4
prognostic prednisone
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!