A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reaccreditation of non-medical prescribers: maintaining competence. | LitMetric

There is no systematic and robust method to assess the competence of non-medical prescribers (NMPs) locally or nationally. NMPs have a responsibility to remain up to date with the knowledge and skills to enable them to prescribe competently and safely within their field of expertise. In 2012, the National Prescribing Centre developed a single competency framework for prescribers defining a set of nine dimensions within three domains that can be used to underpin personal responsibility for prescribing. The authors identified validated assessment tools using a literature search, and selected those suitable for mapping against the nine dimensions. It was hoped that trust NMPs could provide evidence of competence covering all three of the framework domains using the chosen tools. Five NMPs used the tools to create a portfolio and audited them for suitability in establishing a robust and credible evidence-led system to evaluate and accredit ongoing competence. Feedback on their ease of use and applicability was sought. Trust NMPs were then invited to a workshop where the evidence was presented and they were asked to comment on, and contribute to, finalising the tools before they were embedded within trust policy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.12.640DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-medical prescribers
8
trust nmps
8
nmps
5
reaccreditation non-medical
4
prescribers maintaining
4
competence
4
maintaining competence
4
competence systematic
4
systematic robust
4
robust method
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!