AI Article Synopsis

  • This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in elderly prostate cancer patients who have hip prostheses, a demographic that lacks detailed clinical research.
  • Data from 23 non-metastatic prostate cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2011 were analyzed, showing that the majority received a dose of 72 Gy with acceptable toxicity levels and adherence to treatment targets.
  • The findings suggest that VMAT is a promising method for administering higher doses of radiation in patients with hip replacements, resulting in minimal side effects.

Article Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate whether IMRT using VMAT is a viable and safe solution in dose escalated RT in these patients.

Background: An increasing number of prostate cancer patients are elderly and have hip prostheses. These implants pose challenges in radiotherapy treatment planning. Although intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is commonly used, there is a lack of clinical studies documenting its efficacy and toxicities in this subgroup of patients.

Materials And Methods: The data from 23 patients with hip prostheses and non-metastatic prostate cancer treated with VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) between 2009 and 2011, were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, treatment details and outcome data were collected on all patients. The median follow up was 40.9 months. MRI-CT image fusion was performed and the treatment plans were created using RapidArc™ (RA) techniques utilizing 1 or 2 arcs and 10 MV photon beams.

Results: 96% of patients were treated with a dose of 72 Gy/32 fractions over 44 days. 21/23 plans met the PTV targets. The mean homogeneity index was 1.07. 20/23 plans met all OAR constraints (rectum, bladder). Two plans deviated from rectal constraints, four from bladder constraints; all were classed as minor deviations. One patient experienced late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity. Three other patients experienced late grade 2 or lower gastrointestinal toxicity. One patient had biochemical failure and one had a non-prostate cancer related death.

Conclusions: VMAT provides an elegant solution to deliver dose escalated RT in patients with unilateral and bilateral hip replacements with minimal acute and late toxicities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477120PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpor.2015.03.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
12
hip prostheses
12
volumetric modulated
8
modulated arc
8
arc therapy
8
cancer patients
8
dose escalated
8
plans met
8
experienced late
8
late grade
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!