Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the cause-specific survival (CSS) of stage I (tumor [T]1 node [N]0 metastasis [M]0) versus stage II (T2N0M0) glottic cancer in a large population cohort.

Study Design: We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database from 1973 to 2009, comprising patients diagnosed with T1N0M0 or T2N0M0 squamous cell glottic cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and competing-risks survival regression were used for statistical analysis.

Results: There were 4,422 patients who met all inclusion criteria. The 36-month CSS was 93.9% for stage I verus 86.5% for stage II, with P < 0.0001. Stage II status conferred a 2.494 hazard ratio for increased risk of cause-specific death compared to stage I.

Conclusions: Stage II glottic cancers have a significantly worse prognosis and may need a different approach to management than stage I tumors.

Level Of Evidence: 4.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lary.25338DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glottic cancer
12
stage
6
differences survival
4
survival outcome
4
outcome stage
4
stage stage
4
stage glottic
4
cancer seer-based
4
seer-based analysis
4
analysis objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!