Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging.

Radiology

From the Molecular Imaging Program (B.G.M., S.S., P.L.C., B.T.), Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis (J.H.S.), Urologic Oncology Branch (S.R.B., A.G., P.P.), Laboratory of Pathology (M.J.M.), and Center for Interventional Oncology (B.J.W.), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1182, Bldg 10, Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892-1088; Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (B.G.M., J.J.M.C.H.d.l.R.); and Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of The Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (J.M.).

Published: December 2015

Purpose: To evaluate accuracy and interobserver variability with the use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0 for detection of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in a biopsy-naïve patient population.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients for use of their imaging and histopathologic data in future research studies. In 101 biopsy-naïve patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels who underwent multiparametric MR imaging of the prostate and subsequent transrectal ultrasonography (US)-MR imaging fusion-guided biopsy, suspicious lesions detected at multiparametric MR imaging were scored by five readers who were blinded to pathologic results by using to the newly revised PI-RADS and the scoring system developed in-house. Interobserver agreement was evaluated by using κ statistics, and the correlation of pathologic results with each of the two scoring systems was evaluated by using the Kendall τ correlation coefficient.

Results: Specimens of 162 lesions in 94 patients were sampled by means of transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy. Results for 87 (54%) lesions were positive for prostate cancer. Kendall τ values with the PI-RADS and the in-house-developed scoring system, respectively, at T2-weighted MR imaging in the peripheral zone were 0.51 and 0.17 and in the transitional zone, 0.45 and -0.11; at diffusion-weighted MR imaging, 0.42 and 0.28; at dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging, 0.23 and 0.24, and overall suspicion scores were 0.42 and 0.49. Median κ scores among all possible pairs of readers for PI-RADS and the in-house-developed scoring system, respectively, for T2-weighted MR images in the peripheral zone were 0.47 and 0.15; transitional zone, 0.37 and 0.07; diffusion-weighted MR imaging, 0.41 and 0.57; dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, 0.48 and 0.41; and overall suspicion scores, 0.46 and 0.55.

Conclusion: Use of the revised PI-RADS provides moderately reproducible MR imaging scores for detection of clinically relevant disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4666087PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142818DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

imaging
15
prostate cancer
12
multiparametric imaging
12
scoring system
12
interobserver agreement
8
prostate imaging
8
imaging reporting
8
reporting data
8
data system
8
us-mr imaging
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!