A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy after bile duct injury. | LitMetric

Background: The incidence of bile duct injuries (BDI) after cholecystectomy, which is a life-threatening condition that has several medical and legal implications, currently stands at about 0.6%. The aim of this study is to describe our experience as the first center to use a laparoscopic approach for BDI repair.

Methods: A prospective study between June 2012 and September 2014 was developed. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with BDI secondary to cholecystectomy were included. Demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, details of index surgery, type of lesion, preoperative and postoperative diagnostic work-up, and therapeutic interventions were registered. Videos and details of laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (LHJ) were recorded. Injuries were staged using Strasberg classification. A side-to-side anastomosis with Roux-en-Y reconstruction was always used. In patients with E4 and some E3 injuries, a segment 4b or 5 section was done to build a wide anastomosis. In E4 injuries, a neo-confluence was performed. Complications, mortality, and long-term evolution were recorded.

Results: Twenty-nine patients with BDI were operated. Women represented 82.7% of the cases. The median age was 42 years (range 21-74). Injuries at or above the confluence occurred in 62%, and primary repair at our institution was performed at 93.1% of the cases. Eight neo-confluences were performed in all E4 injuries (27.5%). The median operative time was 240 min (range 120-585) and bleeding 200 mL (range 50-1100). Oral intake was started in the first 48 h. Bile leak occurred in 5 cases (17.2%). Two patients required re-intervention (6.8%). No mortality was recorded. The maximum follow-up was 36 months (range 2-36). One patient with E4 injury developed a hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) stenosis after 15 months. This was solved with endoscopic dilatation.

Conclusions: The benefits of minimally invasive approaches in BDI seem to be feasible and safe, even when this is a complex and catastrophic scenario.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4282-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy
8
bile duct
8
patients bdi
8
injuries
6
bdi
5
hepaticojejunostomy bile
4
duct injury
4
injury background
4
background incidence
4
incidence bile
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!