A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: outcomes in 642 patients. | LitMetric

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: outcomes in 642 patients.

Surg Obes Relat Dis

Department of Visceral Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Aigle-Monthey, Switzerland. Electronic address:

Published: February 2016

Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a well-tolerated procedure but has high long-term complication and failure rates. Laparoscopic conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is one of the rescue strategies.

Objectives: To analyze short- and long-term results of reoperative LRYGB after failed LAGB.

Setting: Three European expert bariatric center (2 university hospitals and 1 regional hospital).

Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data, including all consecutive patients submitted to revisional LRYGB for failed LAGB between 1999 and 2013, was performed. Complications were classified according to the Dindo-Clavien system. Long-term results in terms of weight loss were analyzed in a subgroup of patients.

Results: A total of 642 patients (569 women and 73 men) were included. Mean±standard deviation operating time was 188±43 minutes. There was no mortality and an overall complication rate of 9.7%, including 3.6% major complications, with no difference between the 1- or 2-step approaches. Follow-up rate was 88% at 10 years for the Swiss patient cohort. The mean excess body mass index loss was between 65% and 70% throughout the study period, and the mean total weight loss was between 28% and 30% based on the maximum weight. The mean body mass index decreased from 44.7 kg/m(2) before LAGB to 31.6, 32.2, and 32.5 kg/m(2) at 1, 5, and 10 years after revision.

Conclusions: Revisional LRYGB is well tolerated and feasible after failed LAGB. A 1-step approach, in cases without erosion, does not increase operative morbidity. Results up to 10 years after revision are comparable to those reported after primary LRYGB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.04.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

roux-en-y gastric
8
gastric bypass
8
gastric banding
8
642 patients
8
lrygb failed
8
revisional lrygb
8
failed lagb
8
weight loss
8
body mass
8
lrygb
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!