Randomized Phase II Trial of Ridaforolimus in Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma.

J Clin Oncol

Amit M. Oza, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sandro Pignata, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G Pascale"-Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Naples, Italy; Andres Poveda, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain; Mary McCormack, University College Hospital, London; Andrew Clamp, Institute of Cancer Sciences-University of Manchester and the Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Benjamin Schwartz, Island Gynecologic Oncology, Brightwaters, NY; Jonathan Cheng, Xiaoyun Li, and Kristy Campbell, Merck, Kenilworth, NJ; and Pierre Dodion and Frank G. Haluska, ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA.

Published: November 2015

Purpose: The prognosis for women with recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer is poor, and improved therapies are needed. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is an important target, and mTOR inhibitors show clinical activity in endometrial cancer.

Patients And Methods: An open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of oral ridaforolimus compared with progestin or investigator choice chemotherapy (comparator) was undertaken in women with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer who had progressive disease following one or two lines of chemotherapy and no hormonal therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent radiologic review.

Results: One hundred thirty patients were enrolled (64 received ridaforolimus and 66 received the comparator), and median age was 66 years. Treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse events was 33% with ridaforolimus versus 6% with the comparator, with common (> 10%) grade 3 toxicities being hyperglycemia, anemia, and diarrhea. Thirty-eight percent (ridaforolimus) versus 71% (comparator) of patients discontinued treatment as a result of disease progression. Median PFS at the protocol prespecified interim analysis with 58 PFS events (primary end point) was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 7.3 months) for ridaforolimus and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.3 months) for the comparator (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.90; P = .008). PFS rate for ridaforolimus versus comparator was 48% versus 18% at 16 weeks and 38% versus 15% at 24 weeks. Objective response rate for ridaforolimus versus comparator was 0% versus 4% (P = .925), and stable disease was achieved in 35% versus 17% of patients (P = .021).

Conclusion: Oral ridaforolimus shows encouraging activity in advanced endometrial cancer but is associated with significant toxicity. Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway may be a viable therapeutic target.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.58.8871DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ridaforolimus versus
16
endometrial cancer
12
versus comparator
12
ridaforolimus
9
randomized phase
8
phase trial
8
advanced endometrial
8
oral ridaforolimus
8
primary point
8
versus
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The BIONICS and NIREUS trials compared the ridaforolimus-eluting stent (RES) and zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), showing that RES was noninferior to ZES for 1-year target-lesion failure and 6-month lumen loss.
  • A pooled analysis of 2221 patients over 5 years found similar rates of target-lesion failure (12.2% for RES vs 11.3% for ZES), with no significant differences in other outcomes like myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis.
  • Although the RES group had higher rates of target-vessel revascularization and cardiac death, these differences were not significant after adjusting for patient characteristics, indicating long-term
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A study involving 315 patients found that after 1 year, only 4.9% experienced serious events like cardiac death or stent thrombosis, which was better than the pre-set safety target.
  • * The results indicate that a 1-month DAPT is sufficient for patients with stable angina, and some acute coronary syndrome patients had DAPT extended to 3 months, with very low rates of complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcomes of Patients With Coronary Arterial Bifurcation Narrowings Undergoing Provisional 1-Stent Treatment (from the BIONICS Trial).

Am J Cardiol

July 2020

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York; The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. Electronic address:

Treatment of bifurcation lesions is technically challenging and has been associated with an increased risk of adverse events. We sought to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients who underwent bifurcation lesion provisional treatment in the BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis trial. A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents (RES) versus zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

October 2019

Medical Oncology, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Level 6, 119-143 Missenden Road, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050.

Background: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynaecological cancers in developed countries. Treatment of advanced endometrial cancer usually involves radiotherapy, chemotherapy, endocrine therapy or a combination of these. However, survival outcomes are poor in advanced or metastatic disease.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on outcomes following contemporary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) trial.

Background: Patients with DM are at increased risk for adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: A prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized trial was conducted to evaluate in a noninferiority design the safety and efficacy of ridaforolimus-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents among 1,919 patients undergoing PCI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!