Background: In vivo model systems in prostate cancer research that authentically reproduce tumor growth are still sparse. While orthotopic implantation is technically difficult, particularly in the mouse, most models favor subcutaneous tumor growth. This however provides little information about natural tumor growth behavior and tumor stroma interaction. Furthermore, established prostate cancer cell lines grown as in vivo xenografts are not able to reflect the variety of tumor specific growth patterns and growth behavior in men. Primary cell cultures are difficult to handle and an induction of orthotopic tumors has not been successful yet. Therefore, a tumorgraft model using tumor tissue from prostatectomy specimens was developed.

Methods: Balb/c nude mice were used to graft fresh prostate tumor tissue by renal subcapsular and orthotopic implantation. Testosterone propionate was supplemented. Animals were tracked by means of 30 MHz ultrasound to monitor tumor engraftment and growth. Autopsy, histology, PSA measurements as well as immunostaining and PCR for human tissue were performed to confirm orthotopic tumor growth.

Results: Renal subcapsular engraftment was seen in 2 of 3 mice. Orthotopic engraftment was observed in 7 of 11 animals (63.6%) with an overall engraftment of 5 out of 9 patient specimens (55.6%). Ultrasound confirmed the tumor growth over time. Of interest, the tumorgrafts not only retained essential features of the parental tumors, but also stained positive for tumor specific markers such as AR, PSA, and AMACR. Tumor positive animals showed highly elevated serum PSA levels with confirmation of a human specific PCR sequence and a human endothelial cell lining in the tumor vessels.

Conclusions: Standardized implantation of fresh tumor tissue in nude mice prostates generates tumorgrafts with histological properties of organ-confined prostate cancer. These tumorgrafts display a new approach for an optimized in vivo model of prostate cancer and will allow further investigations on specific pathways of tumor initiation and progression as well as therapeutic response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pros.23027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prostate cancer
20
tumor growth
16
tumor
15
nude mice
12
tumor tissue
12
vivo model
8
orthotopic implantation
8
growth behavior
8
tumor specific
8
renal subcapsular
8

Similar Publications

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the current treatment options for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following the failure of first-line therapy. Although significant progress has been made in the primary treatment of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, the management of mCRPC remains a clinical challenge. The article outlines the diagnostic criteria for mCRPC, which can be confirmed through biochemical progression and imaging techniques.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Next generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular panel analysis for metastatic prostate cancer: how often can we detect druggable mutations? : NGS for metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate].

Urologie

January 2025

Klinik für Urologie, Uro-Onkologie, roboter-assistierte und spezielle urologische Chirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50927, Köln, Deutschland.

Introduction: Prostate cancer guidelines recommend molecular analysis of biomaterial following resistance to first-line systemic therapy in order to identify druggable mutations. We report on our results of molecular analysis of tissue specimens via next generation sequencing (NGS) in men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Patients And Methods: In all, 311 mCRPC patients underwent NGS analysis from biopsy samples of progressive metastatic lesions or archival radical prostatectomy specimens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prospective Validation of an Automated Hybrid Multidimensional MRI Tool for Prostate Cancer Detection Using Targeted Biopsy: Comparison with PI-RADS-based Assessment.

Radiol Imaging Cancer

January 2025

From the Department of Radiology (A.C., A.N.Y., R.E., C.H., G.L., M.M., E.B.J., A.L.C., B.G., G.S.K., A.O.), Sanford J. Grossman Center of Excellence in Prostate Imaging and Image Guided Therapy (A.C., A.N.Y., M.M., A.L.C., B.G.), Department of Surgery, Section of Urology (G.G., L.F.R., P.K.M., S.E.), Department of Pathology (T.A.), and Department of Public Health Sciences (M.G.), University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637.

Purpose To evaluate the use of an automated hybrid multidimensional MRI (HM-MRI)-based tool to prospectively identify prostate cancer targets before MRI/US fusion biopsy in comparison with Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System (PI-RADS)-based multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) evaluation by expert radiologists. Materials and Methods In this prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Current approach to clinically suspicious biopsy-naïve men consists performing prostate MRI, followed by combined systematic (TRUS-Bx) and MRI-Ultrasound fusion biopsy (MRI-TBx) in those with PIRADS score ≥ 3. Researchers have attempted to determine who benefits from each biopsy method, but the results do not support the safe use of one method alone. This study aims to determine the optimal approach in biopsy-naïve men, according to their PSA levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!