AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how the microfracture technique combined with intraarticular betamethasone (BMS) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) affects hyaline cartilage regeneration in rabbits.
  • Thirteen rabbits underwent surgical procedures to create cartilage defects, which were then treated with either BMS or PRP, with evaluations done at 12 weeks focusing on various measures including gene expression and histological scoring.
  • Findings indicated that neither BMS nor PRP provided significant advantages over the standard microfracture technique, as there were no notable improvements in cartilage regeneration despite some histological differences observed.

Article Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution to hyaline cartilage regeneration of the microfracture (MFx) technique plus intraarticular betamethasone (BMS) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Design: Full-thickness chondral defects of 3 × 6 mm(2) were surgically performed in both femoral condyles of each knee in 13 New Zealand rabbits and then treated with MFx associated with intraarticular BMS or PRP. At 12 weeks postimplantation, the animals were killed and the condyles were characterized macroscopically, molecularly according to collagen type II and I gene expression (quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction), and histologically (hematoxylin-eosin staining). For the latter, samples were scored using the International Cartilage Repair Society visual histological scale. Data of MFx/BMS-treated and MFx/PRP-treated condyles were compared against untreated, MFx-treated, or normal condyles without lesions.

Results: Our macroscopic findings showed that in MFx/BMS-treated and MFx/PRP-treated groups, the defects were filled with an irregular, partially rough tissue similar to the MFx-treated group. No differences in the ratio between collagen type II versus collagen type I expression were observed among groups. Histological changes were observed between MFx/BMS-treated and MFx/PRP-treated groups versus untreated defects mainly in surface regularity and cell distribution. However, International Cartilage Repair Society score analysis did not support statistical differences between MFx/BMS-treated and MFx/PRP-treated groups versus MFx-treated group.

Conclusions: These results provide evidence that the use of intraarticular BMS or PRP as coadjuvants to the microfracture technique in the treatment of acute chondral lesions is not associated with a significant improvement of hyaline cartilage regeneration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4297125PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603511422053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mfx/bms-treated mfx/prp-treated
16
collagen type
12
mfx/prp-treated groups
12
platelet-rich plasma
8
coadjuvants microfracture
8
chondral lesions
8
hyaline cartilage
8
cartilage regeneration
8
intraarticular bms
8
bms prp
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to assess how the microfracture technique combined with intraarticular betamethasone (BMS) or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) affects hyaline cartilage regeneration in rabbits.
  • Thirteen rabbits underwent surgical procedures to create cartilage defects, which were then treated with either BMS or PRP, with evaluations done at 12 weeks focusing on various measures including gene expression and histological scoring.
  • Findings indicated that neither BMS nor PRP provided significant advantages over the standard microfracture technique, as there were no notable improvements in cartilage regeneration despite some histological differences observed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!