A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. | LitMetric

Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Implement Sci

King's College London, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.

Published: June 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • Mental health policy aims to help staff focus on helping patients recover better.
  • The study looked at many research papers to see how doctors and managers understand recovery in mental health.
  • Three ways of thinking about recovery were found: clinical recovery, personal recovery, and service-defined recovery, with the last one being about how organizations set their recovery goals and needs.

Article Abstract

Background: Mental health policy is for staff to transform their practice towards a recovery orientation. Staff understanding of recovery-orientated practice will influence the implementation of this policy. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of empirical studies identifying clinician and manager conceptualisations of recovery-orientated practice.

Methods: A systematic review of empirical primary research was conducted. Data sources were online databases (n = 8), journal table of contents (n = 5), internet, expert consultation (n = 13), reference lists of included studies and references to included studies. Narrative synthesis was used to integrate the findings.

Results: A total of 10,125 studies were screened, 245 full papers were retrieved, and 22 were included (participants, n = 1163). The following three conceptualisations of recovery-orientated practice were identified: clinical recovery, personal recovery and service-defined recovery. Service-defined recovery is a new conceptualisation which translates recovery into practice according to the goals and financial needs of the organisation.

Conclusions: Organisational priorities influence staff understanding of recovery support. This influence is leading to the emergence of an additional meaning of recovery. The impact of service-led approaches to operationalising recovery-orientated practice has not been evaluated.

Trial Registration: The protocol for the review was pre-registered (PROSPERO 2013: CRD42013005942 ).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464128PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0275-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

staff understanding
12
systematic review
12
narrative synthesis
12
recovery-orientated practice
12
understanding recovery-orientated
8
mental health
8
review narrative
8
recovery
8
conceptualisations recovery-orientated
8
included studies
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!