Association of pretreatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with improvement in ablation outcome in atrial fibrillation patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction.

Heart Rhythm

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; Interventional Electrophysiology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California; Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas; Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California; California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California; Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Montefiore, New York, New York. Electronic address:

Published: September 2015

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of upstream ACEI therapy on postablation AF recurrence and hospitalization in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods: Three hundred forty-five consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablation with low LVEF (≤45%) were classified into group 1 (ACEI+, n = 187 [54%], of whom 44 patients [23.5%] had paroxysmal AF [PAF]) or group 2 (ACEI-, n = 158 [46%]; 31 of these 158 patients [19.6%] had PAF). Additionally, 703 consecutive patients with LVEF >45% undergoing first AF ablation were included for a secondary analysis to evaluate the effect of ACEI treatment in normal ejection fraction. In group 1, ACEI therapy started ≥3 months before ablation and continued through follow-up.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar except for hypertension, which was significantly more prevalent in ACEI+ (71% vs 51%, P < .001). At 24 ± 7 months of follow-up, 109 nonparoxysmal AF patients in group 1 (76%) and 81 (64%) in group 2 (P = .015) were recurrence free. In multivariate analysis, ACEI therapy was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio for ACEI-, 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.7; P = .026]. However, among PAF patients, ACEI use was not associated with ablation success (80% vs 77% in ACEI+ and ACEI-, respectively; P = .82). In the normal-EF population, the success rates between ACEI+ and ACEI- cohorts were similar (71% vs 74%, P = .31). After the index procedure, 17 patients (9.1%) in the ACEI+ group and 28 (17.7%) in the ACEI- cohort (P= .02) required rehospitalization, for a 49% relative risk reduction (relative risk 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.90).

Conclusion: Preablation use of an ACEI is associated with improvement in ablation outcome in patients with nonparoxysmal AF with low LVEF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ejection fraction
12
acei therapy
12
patients
10
angiotensin-converting enzyme
8
enzyme inhibitors
8
improvement ablation
8
ablation outcome
8
atrial fibrillation
8
patients low
8
low left
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!