AI Article Synopsis

  • * Two distraction rates (0.25 mm vs. 0.5 mm daily) were tested over 10 days, with bone formation measured at various time points through techniques like micro-CT and PCR for osteogenic gene expression.
  • * Results showed that the second protocol led to significantly more bone formation after two months, indicating differing patterns based on the distraction rate and highlighting the periosteum's role in bone regeneration.

Article Abstract

The regenerative pathways during periosteal distraction osteogenesis may be influenced by the local environment composed by cells, growth factors, nutrition and mechanical load. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of two protocols of periosteal distraction on bone formation. Custom made distraction devices were surgically fixed onto the calvariae of 60 rabbits. After an initial healing period of 7 days, two groups of animals were submitted to distraction rates of 0.25 and 0.5 mm/24 h for 10 days, respectively. Six animals per group were sacrificed 10 (mid-distraction), 17 (end-distraction), 24 (1-week consolidation), 31 (2-week consolidation) and 77 days (2-month consolidation) after surgery. Newly formed bone was assessed by means of micro-CT and histologically. Expression of transcripts encoding tissue-specific genes (BMP-2, RUNX2, ACP5, SPARC, collagen I α1, collagen II α1 and SOX9) was analyzed by quantitative PCR. Two patterns of bone formation were observed, originating from the old bone surface in Group I and from the periosteum in Group II. Bone volume (BV) and bone mineral density (BMD) significantly increased up to the 2-month consolidation period within the groups (p < 0.05). Significantly more bone was observed in Group II compared to Group I at the 2-month consolidation period (p < 0.001). Expression of transcripts encoding osteogenic genes in bone depended on the time-point of observation (p < 0.05). Low level of transcripts reveals an indirect role of periosteum in the osteogenic process. Two protocols of periosteal distraction in the present model resulted in moderate differences in terms of bone formation. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1121-1131, 2016.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33461DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

periosteal distraction
12
protocols periosteal
8
distraction osteogenesis
8
bone formation
8
2-month consolidation
8
collagen α1
8
bone
6
distraction
5
comparison protocols
4
osteogenesis rabbit
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!