Background: Knowledge of the normal nares-to-carina (NC) distance might prevent accidental bronchial intubation and be helpful when designing preformed endotracheal tubes (ETT).

Objective: The aim was to measure NC distance and to examine whether a height/length-based 'modified Morgan formula' would give useful guidance for nasotracheal ETT depth positioning.

Methods: Two groups were studied. A younger group consisted of nasally intubated postoperative patients. In these, NC distance was obtained as the sum of ETT length and the distance from the ETT tip to the carina, as measured from an anteroposterior chest X-ray. An older group consisted of children who had undergone computerized tomography (CT) examination including head, neck, and chest. In these, NC was measured directly from the CT image. The modified Morgan formula was derived from the NC vs height/length relationship.

Results: Nares-to-carina distance was best predicted by a linear equation based on patient height. The equation in the younger group (1 day-8 years, n = 57) was: NC (cm) = 0.14 × height + 5.8, R(2) = 0.90, and in the older group (2.1-20 years, n = 45): NC (cm) = 0.15 × height + 3.4, R(2) = 0.93. The equation for the groups combined (n = 102) was: NC (cm) = 0.14 × height + 6.2, R(2) = 0.97. Based on the latter equation, a modified Morgan formula was identified as: ETT position at nares in cm = 0.12 × height + 5. If the ETT had been placed as calculated by this formula, the ETT tip would have been at 85 + 5% (mean ± sd) of NC distance, and the ETT tip-to-carina distance would have been 3.1 ± 1.1 cm (range 0-6.6). Bronchial intubation would not have occurred in any child, but a comparison to tracheal length measurements indicates that ETT tip position could be too proximal in some children.

Conclusion: The study confirms previous reports: NC distance can be well predicted from height/length. A modified Morgan formula might decrease the risk for accidental endobronchial intubation in infants and children, but ETT position need to be confirmed by auscultation or other verification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.12693DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nares-to-carina distance
12
modified morgan
12
morgan formula
12
ett position
12
ett
9
'modified morgan
8
morgan formula'
8
formula' guidance
8
distance
8
bronchial intubation
8

Similar Publications

Background: Knowledge of the normal nares-to-carina (NC) distance might prevent accidental bronchial intubation and be helpful when designing preformed endotracheal tubes (ETT).

Objective: The aim was to measure NC distance and to examine whether a height/length-based 'modified Morgan formula' would give useful guidance for nasotracheal ETT depth positioning.

Methods: Two groups were studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Are preformed endotracheal tubes appropriately designed for pediatric patients?

Paediatr Anaesth

September 2015

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

Background: The aim of the study was to examine different brands of preformed oral and nasal endotracheal tubes (ETT) and to assess whether the bend placement gave acceptable guidance for ETT depth positioning in children.

Methods: The distance from the vertex of the bend to the tip (bend-to-tip distance) of seven brands of preformed oral and nasal ETTs were measured. Front teeth-to-carina (FTC) and nares-to-carina (NC) distance data from orally (0-19 years) and nasally (0-8 years) intubated children were used to assess the risk of endobronchial intubation if a preformed ETT had been placed with its bend at the front teeth or nares.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!