Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
It is presented the results of gastrectomy in 431 patients with varying reconstructive-reparative stage. Patients were divided into two comparable groups. The main group consisted of 146 patients who underwent developed technique with food reservoir performing after gastrectomy. Control group included 285 patients after conventional digestive tract reconstruction. It was concluded that 30.4% of patients have entero-esophageal reflux, in 21.7% and 8.7% of patients endoscopic and morphological signs of reflux-esophagitis were observed respectively. Suggested technique creates gas bubble providing obturator mechanism and decreasing the frequency of entero-esophageal reflux to 26.3% and reflux-esophagitis to 5.3%. It proves advantage of suggested method of gastroplasty for prevention of reflux-esophagitis in comparison with traditional digestive tract reconstruction after gastrectomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2015342-47 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!