Does aspirin administration increase perioperative morbidity in patients with cardiac stents undergoing spinal surgery?

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and †Division of spine surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY; and ‡NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.

Published: May 2015

Study Design: Cohort.

Objective: To compare the perioperative morbidity of patients with cardiac stents after spine surgery who continue to take aspirin before and after the operation with a similar group of patients who preoperatively discontinued aspirin.

Summary Of Background Data: The preoperative discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy has been the standard of care for orthopedic surgical procedures. However, recent literature has demonstrated significant cardiac risk associated with aspirin withdrawal in patients with cardiac stents. Although it has recently been demonstrated that performing orthopedic surgery while continuing low-dose aspirin therapy seems to be safe, studies focused on spinal surgery have not yet been performed. Because of the risk of intraspinal bleeding and the serious consequences of subsequent epidural hematoma with associated spinal cord compression, spinal surgeons have been reluctant to operate on patients taking aspirin.

Methods: This institutional review board-approved study included 200 patients. Preoperative parameters and postoperative outcome measures were analyzed for 100 patients who underwent spinal surgery after the discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy and 100 patients who continued to take daily aspirin through the perioperative period. The primary outcome measure was serious bleeding-related postoperative complications such as spinal epidural hematoma. The operative time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, hospital length of stay, transfusion of blood products, and 30-day hospital readmission rates were also recorded and compared.

Results: The patients who continued taking aspirin in the perioperative period had a shorter hospital length of stay on average (4.1 ± 2.7 vs. 6.2 ± 5.8; P < 0.005), as well as a reduced operative time (210 ± 136 vs. 266 ± 143; P < 0.01), whereas there was no significant difference in the estimated blood loss (642 ± 905 vs. 697 ± 1187), the amount of blood products transfused, overall intra- and postoperative complication rate (8% vs. 11%), or 30-day hospital readmission rate (5% vs. 5%). No clinically significant spinal epidural hematomas were observed in either of the study groups.

Conclusion: The current study has observed no appreciable increase in bleeding-related complication rates in patients with cardiac stents undergoing spine surgery while continuing to take aspirin compared with patients who discontinued aspirin prior to surgery. Although very large studies will be needed to determine whether aspirin administration results in a small complication rate increase, the current study provides evidence that perioperative aspirin therapy is relatively safe in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Level Of Evidence: 2.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000695DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients cardiac
16
cardiac stents
16
patients
12
aspirin
10
aspirin administration
8
perioperative morbidity
8
morbidity patients
8
stents undergoing
8
spinal
8
undergoing spinal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!