Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To detect the diagnostic efficacy of emission computed tomography (ECT) in detecting mandibular invasion caused by head and neck cancers.
Materials And Methods: Thirteen databases were searched electronically to retrieve studies for inclusion and a manual search also was conducted. Study inclusion, data extraction, and quality assessment were completed by 2 reviewers independently. Meta-DiSc 1.4 and STATA 11.0 were used to conduct the meta-analysis.
Results: Seventeen studies involving 668 participants were included. One study had a low risk of bias, 2 had a high risk, and the rest had unclear risk. Meta-analysis showed that for the diagnosis of mandibular invasion single-photon ECT (SPECT) had a mean sensitivity (SEN) of 0.96, a mean specificity (SPE) of 0.66, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8989, and a Q* (point on the summary reviewer operator characteristic curve when SEN equaled SPE) of 0.8300. Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) had a mean SEN of 0.83, a mean SPE of 0.90, an AUC of 0.9290, and a Q* of 0.8640. The comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of SPECT and PET/CT showed that SPECT was superior for SEN (P = .0014) and PET/CT had a significantly better SPE (P = .001). The summary diagnostic efficacy between these modalities did not differ significantly (P > .05).
Conclusions: The present clinical evidence showed that SPECT is an excellent tool to exclude patients with no mandibular invasion, but is not as good as PET/CT to confirm the diagnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.041 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!