Introduction: Injury by violence is the fourth cause of death and the leading reason for a youth to visit an emergency department (ED) in Canada. In Winnipeg, 20% of youth who visit an ED with an injury due to violence have a second visit for a subsequent violent injury within 1 year. Youth injured by violence are in a reflective and receptive state of mind, rendering the ED setting appropriate for intervention.

Methods And Analysis: This protocol describes a wraparound care model delivered by a support worker with lived experience with violence, supported by social workers and links to multiple community partners. Support workers will be on call 24 h a day, 7 days a week in order to start the intervention in the ED and take advantage of the 'teachable moment'. The protocol is of a pilot randomised control trial to assess the feasibility of a randomised control trial designed to assess efficacy. For the pilot trial, we will assess recruitment, treatment fidelity, participant adherence and safety. The intervention arm will receive wraparound care initiated at the time of their visit for injury due to violence. The control arm will receive standard care. We will use an adapted preconsent randomisation methodology. This intervention has been developed using an integrated knowledge translation approach.

Discussion: Interventions delivered in the ED for youth injured by violence require an approach that is appropriate for the unique situation the youth are in.

Ethics: The University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board (HS 16445 (Cohort study) and HS 16444 (WrapAround Care study) granted ethical approval.

Trial Registration Number: NCT01895738.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4442171PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008088DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wraparound care
16
youth injured
12
injured violence
12
randomised control
12
control trial
12
injury violence
12
protocol pilot
8
pilot randomised
8
youth visit
8
visit injury
8

Similar Publications

Importance: Safer supply programs were implemented in Canada to provide pharmaceutical-grade alternatives to the toxic unregulated drug supply. While research shows clinical benefits and reduced overdose mortality among safer supply patients, medication diversion remains a concern.

Objective: To examine provider (prescribing clinicians and allied health professionals) and patient perspectives on diversion of opioids prescribed in safer supply programs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

"There was no services that I could access so I just stayed on the street…using until I went into labour.": A qualitative study of accessibility and cultural safety of services for perinatal substance use in British Columbia, Canada.

J Subst Use Addict Treat

December 2024

Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby V5A 1S6, British Columbia, Canada; Health Economic Research Unit, Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes, 570-1081 Burrard St., St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver V6Z 1Y6, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address:

Background: Perinatal substance use is a critical public health challenge, impacting both mother and fetus. Its prevalence has increased in British Columbia, Canada, disproportionately impacting First Nations people. For specialized perinatal substance use services to be effective, they must be accessible and safe.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Setting: The crisis of unregulated fentanyl-related overdose deaths presents a significant public health challenge. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of four Safer Opioid Supply programs (SSPs) in Ontario, one in London and three in Toronto.

Intervention And Implementation: SSPs aim to curtail overdose fatalities while connecting individuals using drugs to healthcare services.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To explore specialist homeless health professionals' perceptions of gaps in homeless health care and understand whether these might be addressed through existing nursing scopes of practice.

Design: Qualitative descriptive study.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of 22 staff in nursing (11) and non-nursing (11) roles, engaged with a Homeless Health Service.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Take Care of the Patient: Pharmacists Should Advocate for Overdose Prevention Centers (OPC) as Harm Reduction.

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)

November 2024

Clinical Professor of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Research, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston, RI, USA. Electronic address:

Overdose prevention centers (OPCs) are places where people can bring previously obtained substances to use under the supervision of trained healthcare professionals who are prepared to intervene in the event of an overdose. Healthcare professionals, counselors and peer support provide services including naloxone distribution, provision of sterile injection equipment, counseling services, referrals to necessary providers, and above all, a safe and compassionate space for people to get the care they need. This is a method of harm reduction that has been used globally for decades and is now gaining traction in the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!